期刊文献+

正常眼压性青光眼中视盘分区指标改变与视野改变间的关系 被引量:6

The interrelationship between the sectorial disc and the visual field changes in patients with normal tension glaucoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪Ⅱ型(HRT-Ⅱ)检测正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)患者视盘分区指标改变及其与HFA-Ⅱ视野改变间的关系。方法26例(51只眼)NTG患者分别接受HRT-Ⅱ视盘立体测量与HFA-Ⅱ中央视野30-2阈值检测。观察患者上、下半侧视野损害与视盘颞上、颞下分区间损害程度的部位对应关系,比较视野早期损害组(EP)与视野损害前期组(PP)间视盘整体与视盘分区内视杯形状测度(CSM)、盘沿面积(RA)、盘沿容积(RV)、视杯平均深度(MCD)及笔者提出的视杯容积指数(CVI)共计5项视盘指标的差异,分析视盘对应分区内上述各项指标分别与各自视野指数(MD)间的相关性。结果视盘分区与半侧视野间损害程度的部位对应关系中,CVI、RA、RV、CSM及MCD5项指标的对应率依次为92.68%、87.80%、82.93%、63.41%及53.66%;CVI、RA及RV3项与CSM和MCD2项间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。视野前期组和早期损害组的MD分别为(-0.0960±1.1920)dB和(-2.4070±1.1370)dB,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组视盘分区内各项指标的差异也均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但视盘整体内各项指标的差异却均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。上述5项视盘指标中仅CSM与MD呈负相关(r=-0.3002,P<0.05),RA与MD呈正相关(r=0.3105,P<0.05),但相关程度均较弱。结论对于NTG患者的早期视野损害,视盘颞上或颞下分区内CSM、RA、RV、MCD及CVI5项指标比视盘整体内相应指标有更灵敏的提示作用。临床上应用HRT-Ⅱ检查视盘分区指标,与两种视野检查结果结合及比照有助于NTG的早期诊断。(中华眼科杂志,2006,42:204-208) Objective To investigate the changes of the sectorial discs and visual fields,and their interrelationships in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG). Methods 26 patients with NTG were undergone the optic nerve and visual field examinations with HRT-Ⅱ and HFA Ⅱ in a time interval of less than 5 months. The parameters in the study including cup shape measure (CSM), rim area (RA), rim volume (RV) , mean cup depth (MCD) and cup volume index (CVI) were compared between the global discs and the sectorial discs in eyes with the evidences of preperimetric or early visual field defect ( MD 4 dB). The CVI was proposed robe equal to CV/ (DA ×MCD +RA× RNFLT) ,where DA was disc area and RNFLT was retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. The linear correlations were evaluated between the visual field MD and each of 5 parameters in sectorial discs. Results The sectorial disc areas were mostly in correspondence to the damaged hemifields (CVI: 92. 68%, RA: 87. 80% ,RV: 82. 93% ). In addition,a correlation was seen for CSM and MCD (63.41% and 53. 66% ;χ^2 = 23.17, P 〈 0. 05 ). The comparison between preperimeteric and early defects were significantly difference (t= 1. 735 - 6. 536 ,P 〈0. 05 - P 〈 0. 05,one-sided t test). The correlation between CSM and MD was negative (r = -0. 3002,P 〉 0. 05), however the positive correlation was demonstrated in RA versus MD(r = 0. 3105 ,P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The examination of the 5 parameters of sectorial discs had even closer relationship than those of global discs scanning in the detection of early vision field defect and it is valuable in diagnosis of early glaucoma.
出处 《中华眼科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期204-208,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
关键词 视盘 视野检查法 视野 青光眼 体层摄影术 Optic disk Perimetry Visual fields Glaucoma Tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kamal D,Hitchings R.Normal tension glaucoma.Br J Ophthalmol,1998,82:835-840.
  • 2Caprioli J,Maguire M.The "Not Quite"natural history of normal tension glaucoma.Ophthalmology,2001,108:245-246.
  • 3任泽钦,乔荣华,刘丽娜.HRT-Ⅱ指标体系的分析及其在正常眼压青光眼的应用[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2004,22(10):783-787. 被引量:9
  • 4Mikelberg FS,Parfitt CM,Swindale NV,et al.Ability of the Heidelberg retina tomography to detect early glaucomatous field loss.J Glaucoma,1995,4:242-247.
  • 5Burgoyne CF,Mercante DE,Thompson HW:Change detection in regional and volumetric disc parameters using longitudinal confocal scanning laser tomography.Ophthalmology,2002,109:455-466.
  • 6Jonas JB,Budde WM,Panda-Jonas S.Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head.Surv Ophthalmol,1999,43:293-320.
  • 7Johnson CA.Recent developments in automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis and management.Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2002,13:77-84.
  • 8Spry PG,Johnson CA.Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss.Surv Ophthalmol,2002,47:158-173.
  • 9Ford BA,Artes PH,McCormick TA,et al.Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg retina tomograph.Ophthalmology,2003,110:1145-1150.
  • 10Iester M,Mardin CY,Budde WM,et al.Discriminant analysis formulas of optic nerve head parameters measured by confocal scanning laser tomography.J Glaucoma,2002,11:97-104.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Kamal D,Hitchings R.Normal Tension Glaucoma.Br J Ophthalmol,1998,82:835~840
  • 2Zinser G,Harbarth U,Schroeder H.Formation and Analysis of Three-Dimensional Data with the Laser Tomographic Scanner(LTS).In:Nasemann JE,Burk ROW(Ed).Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy and Tomography.Quintessenz Verlag,Muechen,1990,243~252
  • 3Caprioli J,Maguire M.The "Not Quite"Natural History of Normal Tension Glaucoma.Ophthalmology,2001,108:245~246
  • 4Wax MB,Camras CB,Fiscella RG,et al.Emerging Perspectives in Glaucoma.Am J Ophthalmol,2002,133:1~10
  • 5Chauhan BC,McCormick TA,Nicotela MT,et al.Optic Disc and Visual Field Changes in a Prospective Longitudinal Study of Patients wit Glaucoma.Comparison of Scanning Laser Tomograph withConventional Perimetry and Optic Disc Photography.Arch Opthalmol,2001,119:1492~1499
  • 6Ford BA,Artes PH,McCormick TA,et al.Comparison of Data Analysis Tools for Detection of Glaucoma with The Heidelberg Retina Tomography.Opthalmology,2003,110:1145~11150
  • 7Chauhan BC,Blanchard JW,Hamilton DC,et al.Technique for Detecting.Serial Topographic Changes in the Optic Disc and Peripapillary Retina Using Scanning Laser TomographyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2000,41:775~782

共引文献8

同被引文献70

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部