期刊文献+

基于Nash均衡约束的竞争性评估方法研究 被引量:17

Study of competitive assessment approach based on restriction of Nash equilibrium
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于多指标决策模型(MCDM),研究了在Nash均衡约束的基础上,如何根据各决策单元(DMU)本身的特点来获取不同DMU的优势权重从而达到最终决策时自身的优势最大化.从新的角度,引入Nash均衡约束,提出了基于Nash均衡约束的多指标决策竞争性评估模型.在主体自身优势最大化的基础上,增加Nash均衡约束,通过约束参数的不断迭代,达到各决策单元的优势均衡,给出了一种新的基于优势均衡的客观确定权重的方法. Based on a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) model, this paper investigates how the set of criteria weights (or weight-set thereafter) is determined to compete for alternatives' maximum advantages according to its own characteristic of alternatives based on the restriction of Nash equilibrium. Each alternative is called a decision making unit (DMU). We introduce the restriction of Nash equilibrium and present the model of competitive assessment based on the restriction of Nash equilibrium in multi-criteria decision making (CANEM). Each DMUs will get its optimum weight-set according to CANEM and be ranked by the result calculated by optimum weight-set finally. At the same time the advantages' equilibrium of all DMUs will be achieved. This paper presents a new method to get objective weight-set based on advantages' equilibrium of all DMUs.
作者 余雁 梁
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期8-13,共6页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家863基金资助项目(2002AA46361) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70371023)
关键词 决策单元 多指标决策 权重 约束参数 DMU multiple criteria decision-making weight Nash equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1梁樑,王国华.多层次交互式确定权重的方法[J].系统工程学报,2002,17(4):358-363. 被引量:45
  • 2Dyer J S,Fishburn P C,Steuer R E.Multiple criteria decision making,multi-attribute utility theory:The next ten years[J].Management Sci.,1992,38(5):645-654.
  • 3Hwang C L,Yoon K.Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications[M].Berlin Heidelberg:Springer,1981.
  • 4Teghem J,Delhaye C,Kunsch P L.An interactive decision support system (IDSS) for multi-criteria decision aid[J].Math.Compute Modeling,1989,12:10=11:1311-1320.
  • 5Yoon K,Hwang C L.Multiple Attribute Decision Making:An Introduction.Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,1995.
  • 6宋庆克,汪希龄,胡铁牛.多属性评价方法及发展评述[J].决策与决策支持系统,1997(4):130-140. 被引量:27
  • 7方卫国,周泓.逼近群体理想点的多目标群体决策算法[J].管理科学学报,1998,1(4):34-38. 被引量:32
  • 8徐泽水,孙在东.一类不确定型多属性决策问题的排序方法[J].管理科学学报,2002,5(3):35-39. 被引量:182
  • 9Ozernoy V M.Choosing the best' multiple criteria decision-making method[J].INFOR,1992,30:159-171.
  • 10Stewart T J.A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice[J].OMEGA,1992,20:569-586.

二级参考文献24

  • 1王应明,傅国伟.运用无限方案多目标决策方法进行有限方案多目标决策[J].控制与决策,1993,8(1):25-29. 被引量:70
  • 2严鸿和,陈玉祥,许昭明,杨皖苏.专家评分机理与最优综合评价模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,1989,9(2):19-23. 被引量:77
  • 3陈廷.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.172-176.
  • 4袁亚湘 孙文瑜.最优化理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1999..
  • 5仝茂达.线性系统理论与设计[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,1998.5-28.
  • 6福州市统计局.福州统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1999..
  • 7合肥市统计局.合肥统计年鉴[M].合肥:合肥市统计局,1999..
  • 8陈珽.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1999..
  • 9Ozernoy V M.Choosing the“best”multiple criteria decision-making method[J].INFOR,1992,30:159-171.
  • 10Stewart T J.A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice[J].OMEGA,1992,20:569~586.

共引文献520

同被引文献135

引证文献17

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部