作为本土知识的仪式空间──以大理喜洲为例被引量：19

Sphere of Ritual Ceremony and Indigenous Knowledge──Taking Xizhou in Dali as the Example

下载PDF

导出

摘要社会人类学家提出,行政、市场、仪式是三种形成空间的力量。笔者根据在大理喜洲的田野工作提出,虽然三种力量造成了三种社会空间,但只有仪式空间才是当地人的本土知识。行政和市场力量形成的空间因变动不定而脱离了本土社会分类,只能用客位的视角观察到。因此,在探讨空间形成力量之前,研究者应该在主位与客位的视角之间做出选择。 Social anthropologists point out that administratton, market and ritual ceremony are the three powers which form sphere. Based on the field work in Xizhou in Dali, this paper holds that sphere of ritual eeremony is the only indigenous knowledge of the native. The sphere formed by administration and market can only be observed by etic approach because of its mobility. Therefore the researcher should make the choice between emic and erie approaches before he makes a study of the power of forming sphere.

作者梁永佳

机构地区北京师范大学民俗学与文化人类学研究所

出处《中南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期11-16,共6页 Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)

关键词仪式空间本土知识主位与客位大理 sphere of ritual ceremony indigenous knowledge emie approach and etic approach Dali

分类号 C912.4 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1BARNARD,ALAN,JONATHAN SPENCER.Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology [ M ].London:Routledge,1996:609.
2厄里.关于时间与空间的社会学[M]//布赖恩·特纳.社会理论指南.李康,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2003:505.
3涂尔干.宗教生活的基本形式[M].上海人民出版社,1999年..
4埃文斯-普理查德.努尔人[M].褚建芳,等,译.北京:华夏出版社,2001:118.
5FORTES,MEYER.Structure of Unilineal Descent Groups[J].American Anthropologist.1953,55:28.LEACH,EDMUND.Political Systems of Highland Burma [M].London:The Athlone Press,1970.
6BROOK,TIMOTHY.The spatial structure of Ming local administration[J].Late Imperial China,1985 (6):1-55.
7王铭铭.明清时期的区位、行政与地域崇拜-来自闽南的个案研究[M]//杨念群.空间·记忆·社会转型.上海:上海人民出版社,2001:83.
8孔飞力.叫魂-1768年中国妖术大恐慌[M].陈兼,刘昶,译.上海:上海三联书店,1998.
9弗里德曼.中国东南的宗族组织[M].刘晓春,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.
10施坚雅.中华帝国晚期的城市[C].叶光庭,等译.北京:中华书局,2000:327-417.

二级参考文献21

1石泰安耿昇译.《川甘青藏走廊古部落》[M].四川民族出版社,1992年版..
2.《华夏边缘—历史记忆与族群认同》[M].台北:允晨文化实业股份公司,1997年..
3王明珂.《根基历史:羌族的弟兄故事》[A].黄应贵主编.《时间、历史与记忆》[C].中研院民族研究所(台北),1999年版..
4Lewis A. Coser, "Introduction: Maurice Halbwachs," in On Collective Memory, ed. & trans, by Lewis A. Coser(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992).
5Maurice Halbwachs, Les cadres sociaux de la memoire (Paris:Presses Universitaires de France, 1952).
6Frederick Bartlett, Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (London: Cambridge University Press, 1932), pp. 199-202, 296.
7James Fentress and Chris Wickham, Social Memory (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1992), p. Ⅸ .
8Robert J. Sharer & Wendy Ashmore, Archaeology: Discovering Our Past (Mountain View, CA. : Mayfield Publishing Co., 1987), pp. 72-75.
9王明珂.《历史文献的社会记忆残余本质与异例研究—考古学的隐喻》，《民国以来的史料与史学》，国史馆(台北)，1998年.
10Henry S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas(USA: Dorset Press, 1986/1861).