摘要
目的：探讨后腹膜腹腔镜肾癌根治术临床应用的安全性。方法：行后腹腔镜肾癌根治术27例，经腹腹腔镜行肾癌根治术24例，比较两种方法肠管及大血管的损伤、手术时间、出血量、住院时间、CO2对机体的影响（血气分析：PaCO2、pH）、肠道恢复时间、肠粘连、术后肩痛、切口种植转移的差别。结果：后腹腔镜手术时问为（180±30）min，出血80—300ml，平均120ml，均未输血，平均住院7d；切口种植转移1例，术后肩痛1例，肠道恢复时间（24±4）h，血气分析pH（7．35±0．11）、PaCO2（42．45±6．15）mmHg；经腹腹腔镜3例穿刺损伤肠管、2例损伤腹部血管，手术时间（200±40）min，出血100～300ml，平均200ml，均未输血，血气分析pH（7．40±0．10）、PaCO2（43．45±6．45）mmHg；平均住院10d，术后肩痛8例，肠道恢复时间（38±6）h，2例发生肠梗阻。结论：后腹腔镜肾癌根治术同经腹腹腔镜肾癌根治术相比，出血少，康复快，血管及肠管的损伤、肠道功能恢复、术后肩痛均有显著性差异（P〈0.05）；血气分析，切口种植转移无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。手术效果相当.
Objective：To summary the experience of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephreetomy. Methods：Twenty-seven retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and twenty-five transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy were performed, operation time, blood loss, risks related to trocar insertion, CO2 absorption, postoperative ileus, shoulder pain,length of stay and effect of operation of them were comparatively studied. Results： All cases were performed successfully. There was no case converting to open surgery. In retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy the operative time was （ 180 ± 30 ）min, the average blood loss was 120ml and the time of recovery of bowel function was （24 ± 4 ）h. In transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy the operative time was （200 ±40 ）min. The average blood loss was 200ml and the time of recovery of the bowel function was （38 ±6 ）h. Conclusions： Retroperitoneal laparoseopie radical nephreetomy was superior to transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, It has the merits of less blood loss, less shouder and neck pain and faster recovery of the bowel function.
出处
《腹腔镜外科杂志》
2006年第1期41-42,共2页
Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词
肾肿瘤
后腹膜腹腔镜
肾切除术
腹腔镜
Kidney neoplasms
Retroperltoneal laparoscopic
Nephrectomy
Laparoscopy
