期刊文献+

HIV抗体筛查实验阳性 确认实验可疑和阴性标本的对比分析 被引量:31

Comparative analysis of the results of suspected and 'negative' specimens in confirmation tests
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨艾滋病病毒(HIV)抗体检测确认实验免疫印迹试验(WB)是否能够有效区别筛查阳性的可疑标本和阴性标本。方法筛查实验采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),确认实验采用WB法;采用两样本含量较大时均数u检验方法分析阳性-可疑组及阳性-阴性组的S/CO比值,判断两组是否存在显著性差异。结果分析了92份阳性-可疑标本和63份阳性-阴性标本的S/CO比值,两组之间无显著性差异。结论研究和实践都表明,确认实验WB方法不能有效区别筛查阳性的可疑标本和阴性标本。WB方法在确定可疑标本方面存在相当大的不足。 Objective To study whether confirmation test of HIV antibody (Western blot)was capable of effectively differentiating ‘ suspected' and ‘ negative' specimens that were all ‘ positive' in primary screening test. Methods Primary screening test applied ELISA assay; confirmation test applied Western blot assay. We applied statistic analysis(u-test) to judge whether it was significantly different in S/CO ratios between ‘posltiversuspected'and ‘positive negative' specimens. Results There were 92 ‘positive suspected'specimens and 63 ‘positive-negative'specimens. h was not significantly different between these two groups.Conclusion Our study and practice indicated that confirmation test of HIV antibody (Western blot)could not effectively differentiate ‘ suspected' and‘negative' specimens that were all ‘ positive' in primary screening test.WB assay had serious limitation in confirming ‘suspected' specimens.
出处 《中国艾滋病性病》 CAS 2006年第1期4-6,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aids & STD
关键词 艾滋病病毒 筛查实验 确认实验 S/CO比值 HIV Primary screening test of HIV antibody Confirmation test S/CO ratios
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献3

  • 1中华人民共和国卫生部.全国艾滋病检测工作规范[M].,1997..
  • 2Oxtoby M J, Perinatally acquired human immunodeficiency virus infection [J ]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 1999 ,9: 609- 619.
  • 3李宏,王哲,王春俭,韩卫国,崔为国,薛晓玲.HIV—1感染者确认实验带型分析[J].中国性病艾滋病防治,1999,5(3):130-131. 被引量:5

共引文献39

同被引文献209

引证文献31

二级引证文献241

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部