期刊文献+

WHO标准和RECIST在肺癌多中心疗效评价的比较 被引量:42

Multicencter Study on Comparison of Response Rate between WHO Criteria and RESCIT for Lung Cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:评价单径和双径测量方法在肺癌近期疗效评价中的一致性。方法:对187例非小细胞肺癌患者的近期疗效进行评估。分别采用RECIST和WHO标准进行疗效评估。测量肿瘤最大直径及其最大垂直径,分别以最大径之和(LDs)及最大垂直径乘积之和(LPDs)计算疗效,按照病灶缩小百分比,疗效分为CR、PR、SD和PD。对两种方法的一致性用等级相关方法进行统计分析。结果:两种方法的一致性较好,反应率相关系数rs=0.622,稳定率相关系数rs=0.864,两种评价标准的结果间存在相关关系(P<0.05)。结论:RECIST标准较WHO标准简单易用,两种方法间具有较好的一致性。 Objective: To evaluate the concordance between the single diameter and the double diameter in response rate of the non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: The tumor response rate of 187 patients with lung cancer was evaluated by RECIST and WHO criteria respectively. The largest diameter and perpendicular diameter of tumor were measured and the curative effect was calculated by the sum of the largest diameters (LDs) and the product of multiplication of the largest perpendicular diameters (LPDs) respectively. According to the percentage of tumor shrinkage, response rate was divied into the CR, PR, SD and PD groups. Results: The concordance between the methods was good, and the coefficient correlation of the response rate rs=0.622, and coefficient correlation of stabilization rate rs= 0.864, which showed that there was a correlativity between the two methods (P〈005). Conclusion: RESCIT is more simple and easy than WHO criteria, and there is a good concordance between the two appraisement methods.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期253-255,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
基金 国家科技部"十五"重点攻关项目基金资助(编号:2001BA701A15b)
关键词 疗效评价 非小细胞肺癌 WHO标准 RECIST Evaluation of curative effect Non-small cell lung cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):205~216.
  • 2Watanabe H,Yamamoto S,Kunitoh H,et al.Tumor response to chemotherapy:The validity and reproducibility of RECIST guidelines in NSCLC patients[J].Cancer Sci,2003,94(11):1015~1020.
  • 3陈智伟,廖美琳,陈玉蓉,赵家美,张心敏,成柏君.WHO标准和RECIST标准评价肺癌化疗疗效的比较[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):83-84. 被引量:36
  • 4Gehan EA,Tefft MC.Will There Be Resistance to the RECIST(Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)[J]?J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):179 ~181.
  • 5Lavin PT,Flowerdew G.Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumors[J].Cancer,1980,46(5):1286 ~ 1290.
  • 6James K,Eisenhauer E,Christian M,et al.Measuring response in solid tumors:unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91(6):523~528.
  • 7Mazumdar M,Smith A,Lawrence H,et al.A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline[J].J Clin Epidem,57(4):358~365.
  • 8陈志峰,李成柱,刘少翔,侯浚,王济民.中医药治疗原发性非小细胞肺癌疗效的Meta分析[J].中医杂志,1999,40(5):287-289. 被引量:102

二级参考文献20

  • 1徐勇.Meta分析常见资料类型及统计分析方法[J].中华预防医学杂志,1994,28(5):303-307. 被引量:66
  • 2李佩文,张代钊,郝迎旭,崔惠娟,罗兰,于莉莉,李凯鹏,郤凤兰.平肺方治疗非小细胞肺癌109例临床观察[J].中医杂志,1995,36(2):87-88. 被引量:46
  • 3陈志峰,刘少翔,侯浚.癌瘤概念的再认识与中医药治疗研究的思考[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1996,16(6):368-370. 被引量:21
  • 4朴炳奎 唐文秀 等.肺瘤平膏治疗晚期原发性肺癌临床观察[J].中医杂志,1991,32(4):213-213.
  • 5洪元康.复方三生注射液对肺癌的临床研究[J].亚洲医药,1997,(5):26-26.
  • 6汪祥辉 许光华 等.肿瘤诊治指南[M].北京:北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994.197.
  • 7李连弟,鲁凤珠,张思维,牧人,孙秀娣,皇甫小梅,孙杰,周有尚,欧阳宁慧,饶克勤,陈育德,孙爱明,薛志福,夏毅.中国恶性肿瘤死亡率20年变化趋势和近期预测分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1997,19(1):3-9. 被引量:868
  • 8[1]WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment[M]. Offset Publication No.48. Geneva (Switzerland) : World Health Organization, 1979.
  • 9[2]Duffaud F, Therasse P. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [J]. Bull Cancer, 2000,87:881-886.
  • 10[3]James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999,91:523-528.

共引文献135

同被引文献322

引证文献42

二级引证文献304

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部