4Higgins TL,Yared JP,Goodale DB,et al. Propofol versus midazolam forintensive care unit sedation after coronary artery bypass graftlng[J]. Crit Care Med,1994,22:1415-14231.
5Davis DP,Kimhro TA,Vilke GM. The use of midazolam for prehospital rapid sequence intubation may be associated with a doserelated increase in hypotension[J]. Prehospital Emergency Care,2001,5(2): 163-168.
二级参考文献16
1[1]Li J,Murphy-Lavoie H,Bugas C, et al.Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis[J].Am J Emerg Med,1999,17(2):141-143.
2[2]Ma OJ,Atchley RB,Brady W, et al.Intubation success rates improve for an air medical program after implementing the use of neuromuscular blocking agents[J].Am J Emerg Med,1998,16:125-127.
3[3]Olsen JC,Gurr DE,Hughes M.Video analysis of emergency medicine residents performing rapid sequence intubations[J].J of Emerg Med,2000,18(4):469-472.
4[4]Sakles JC,Laurin EG,Panacek EA, et al.Rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation of emergency department patients[J].J of Emerg Med,1999,17(4):611-616.
5[5]Mazurek AJ,Rae B,Cote CJ,et al.Rocuronium versus succinylcholine:are they equally effective during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia[J]? Anesth Analg,1998,87:1259-1262.
6[6]Magorian T,Flannery KB,Miller RD.Comparison of rocuronium,succi-nylcholine and vecuronium for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients[J].Anesthesiology, 1993,79:913-918.
7[7]Higgins TL,Yared JP,Goodale DB,et al.Propofol versus midazolam for intensive care unit sedation after coronary artery bypass grafting[J].Crit Care Med,1994,22:1415-1423.
8[8]Lebowitz PW,Cote ME,Daniels AL,et al.Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients[J].Anesth Analg,1982,61:771-775.
9[9]Wright SW,Chudnofsky CR,Borron SW,et al.Midazolam use in the emergency department[J].Am J Emerg Med,1990,8:97-100.
10[10]Cernaianu AC,Delrossi AJ,Flum DR,et al.Lorazepam and midazolam in the intensive care unit:a randomized,prospective,multicenter study of hemodynamics,oxygen transport efficacy and cost[J].Crit Care Med,1996,24:222-228.
6Higgins TL,Yared JP,Goodale DB,et al.Propofol versus midazolam forintensive care unit sedation after coronary artery bypass grafting[J].Crit Care Med,1994,22:1415-14231.
7Choi YF, Wong TW, Lau CC. Midazolam is more likely to cause hypotension than etomidate in emergency department rapid se- quence intubation [ J ]. Emerg Med J, 2004, 21 (6) : 700 - 702.
8Jabre P, Combes X, Lapostolle F, et al. Etomidate versus ket- amine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients : a multi- centre randomised controlled trial [ J ]. Lancet, 2009, 374 (9686) : 293 -300.
9Jacoby J, Heller M, Nicholas J, et al. Etomidate versus midazo- lam for out - of - hospital intubation: a prospective, randomized trial[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2006, 47(6) : 525 -530.
10Higgins TL, Yared JP, Estafanous FG, et al. Propofol versus mid- azolam forintensive care unit sedation after coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Crit Care Med, 1994, 22(9) : 1415 -1423.
