期刊文献+

胆总管巨大结石内镜下治疗效果的评价 被引量:9

THE ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL EFFICIENCY OF REMOVING HUGE COMMON BILE DUCT STONES BY ENDOSCOPY
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨胆总管巨大结石内镜下分次取石治疗的临床效果。方法183例胆总管结石大于1.5 cm的患者,在内镜下按照机械碎石、网篮和气囊取石、胆管引流(鼻胆管、塑料支架)等方法进行胆管内取石,记录乳头肌切开的大小、结石大小与碎石、取石次数和并发症。结果胆总管结石越大所需碎石、取石的次数越多,需要置放胆管引流的患者越多,需要外科手术的患者也多,但其他并发症未见明显增多。结论胆总管巨大结石内镜下分次治疗的方法是安全的、可靠的。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficiency of stepwisely removing huge common bile duct stones by endoscopic treantment (ERCP and EST). Motheds 183 patients with common bile duct stones no less than 1.5 cm were selected to take the endoscopic treatment, such as mechanical lithotripsy, removing stones by basketnet with/or balloon, and bile duct drainage (endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, Teflon plastic stents). The size of the dissected papillary muscle and diameters of the calculus, the times of the operation and the complications caused by ERCP and EST were recorded. Results While the size of the calculus is bigger, the times of removing stone increased and bile duct drainage and surgical intervention were more needed. However, other complications didn't rise apparently. Conclusion Removing the common bile duct stones step by step by endoscopic treatment (ERCP and EST, lithotripsy, etc) is efficient, safe and reliable.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2006年第1期10-13,共4页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 胆总管巨大结石 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影 内镜下乳头肌切开 内镜下取石术 huge common bile duct stones endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography endoscopic sphincterotomy endoscopic removal of stones.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献39

  • 1Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami I. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 1974; 20:148-151.
  • 2Cart-Locke DL. Therapeutic role of ERCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(6 Suppl): S170-S174.
  • 3Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, Yasuda I, Hasebe O, Igarashi Y, Murakami A, Mukai H, Fujii T, Yamao K, Maeshiro K.JESED Study Group. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:151-155.
  • 4Cipolletta L, Costamagna G, Bianco MA, Rotondano G,Piscopo R, Mutignani M, Marmo R. Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones. Br J Surg 1997;84:1407-1409.
  • 5Van Dam J, Sivak MV. Mechanical lithotripsy of large common bile duct stones. Cleve Clin J Med 1993; 60:38-42.
  • 6Higuchi T, Kon Y. Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy for the treatment of common bile duct stone. Experience with the improved double sheath basket catheter. Endoscopy 1987; 19:216-217.
  • 7Shaw MJ, Dorsher PJ, Vennes JA. A new mechanical lithotripter for treatment of large common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85:796-808.
  • 8Siegel JH, Ben-Zvi JS, Pullano WE. Mechanical lithotripsy of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 351-356.
  • 9Shaw MJ, Mackie RD, Moore JP. Results of a multicenter trial using a mechanical lithotripter for the treatment of large common bile duct stones. Am I Gastroenterol 1993; 88:730-733.
  • 10Chung SC, Leung JW, Leong HT, Li AK. Mechanical lithotripsy of large common bile duct stones using a basket. Br J Surg 1991; 78;1448-1550.

共引文献24

同被引文献54

引证文献9

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部