期刊文献+

鱼雷武器系统寿命周期费用与效能评估的模糊理想点法 被引量:1

Fuzzy Ideal Point Method for Estimation of Life Cycle Cost and Effectiveness of Torpedo Weapon System
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 选择优化理论中的理想点法对鱼雷武器系统的寿命周期费用与效能作评估,同时对于寿命周期费用和效能这2个模糊数,采用模糊数学中贴近度的概念来估算不同方案的费用和效能与模糊的理想点和负理想点之间的距离。结合实例对4种鱼雷武器系统寿命周期费用与效能进行了评估。结果表明,这种方法具有实用价值。 The ideal point method in optimization theory was selected to estimate the life cycle cost and effectiveness for torpedo weapon systems. And, the concept of closeness degree of fuzzy mathematics was used to compute the distance between the life cycle cost/effectiveness and the ideal point/negative ideal point. As examples, four torpedo weapon systems were estimated. The results indicate that this method can be used practically.
出处 《兵工学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期137-140,共4页 Acta Armamentarii
基金 西北工业大学博士论文创新基金项目(CX200304)
关键词 系统评估与可行性分析 鱼雷武器系统 寿命周期费用 效能 模糊理想点法 贴近度 systematic evaluation and feasibility analysis torpedo weapon system life cycle cost effectiveness fuzzy ideal point method closeness degree
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Mcarthur C J,Snyder H M.Life cycle cost the logistics support analysis connection[C].Aerospace and Electronics Conference,National Proceedings of IEEE,1989:1206-1209.
  • 2Proffitt J T.Life cycle costs of aircraft systems[J].British Crown Copyright,1994,(1):1-3.
  • 3Louis E Greene.Life cycle cost (LCC) milestones[J].IEEE,1991:1197-1200.
  • 4日比宗平.寿命周期费用评价法-方法及实例[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1984.5-12.
  • 5罗承忠.模糊集引论[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1989..
  • 6王彩华 宋连天.模糊论方法学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1988..

共引文献108

同被引文献17

  • 1朱海平,邵新宇,张国军.不确定信息条件下的车间调度策略研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(10):1637-1642. 被引量:16
  • 2范珉,余承华,史业宏.综合费-效分析的军用机场建设项目灰色评价[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2007,8(1):21-23. 被引量:7
  • 3廖武,陈云翔,孟飙.基于DEA的装备费效分析[J].计算机工程与应用,2007,43(9):219-222. 被引量:12
  • 4谭云涛,郭波.基于CAIV的武器装备费效分析与指标决策方法研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(11):48-53. 被引量:14
  • 5DOWDALL J B, PAVLIDIS I, BEBIS G. Face detection in the near-IR spectrum[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2003, 21(7):565 578.
  • 6BROPHY J M, ERICKSON L J. Cost effectiveness of drug e luting coronary stents in Quebec, Canada [J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2005, 21 (3) :326-333.
  • 7WALKER W E. POLSSS: overview and cost- effectiveness a nalysis[J]. Safety Science, 2000,35 (1) : 105-121.
  • 8RONALD L. Quantitative decision support for upgrading com- plex systems of systemsED~. Washington, D. C. , USA: George Washington University, 1997.
  • 9BRODEN D, GILLES V. Assuring advanced small arms sys- tem value utilizing cost as an independent valuable(CAIV) EC~//Proeeedings of the 2001 Joint Services Small Arms Sym- posium, Exhibition ~ Firing Demonstration. Arlington, Mass. , USA ~ National Defense Industrial Association, 2001 ~ 1-33.
  • 10ARDANUY P, SEHUELER C, MILLER S. Use of CAIV techniques to build advanced VIIRS approaches for NPOESS key EDRs E C~//Proceedings of Earth Observing Systems VII. Washington, D. C. ,USA~SPIE,2002:142-151.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部