摘要
盗窃犯罪是我国发生率最高的犯罪,严重侵害了我国人民的财产安全和生活安宁。由于盗窃犯罪在实践中形态各异,中外刑法理论界关于盗窃罪既遂与未遂的认定存在着较大的争论,而且目前关于认定盗窃既遂与未遂的理论都存在着较大的缺陷,在司法实务中存在着难以适用的问题。以财物的控制方式为突破口,财物的控制方式首先可分为室内控制和室外控制,各又都可以分为随身控制和非随身控制,在此基础上确定了盗窃犯罪的既遂与未遂的标准。
Larceny is the most popular crime in our country, which has badly infringed the safety of property and the peace of people＇ s life. But, because of the complexity of theft in the practice, the theories of how to distinguish accomplished offense between unaccomplished＇offense of larceny have big disputes. Moreover, the present theories have many defects and can＇t be easily applied into practice. This passage defines the standard of accomplished offense between unaccomplished offense of larceny, depending on the ways of control of property, which can be divided into indoor control and outdoor control, and the two ways can be further divided into taking along with and not taking along with.
出处
《河北理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2005年第4期37-39,42,共4页
Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University:Social Science Edition
关键词
盗窃犯罪
控制方式
既遂
未遂
larceny
ways of control
accomplished offense
unaccomplished offense
