期刊文献+

RapIDYeast Plus系统在鉴定常见酵母中的临床应用 被引量:1

Clinical application of RapIDYeast Plus system in identifying 150 clinically common yeasts
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨RapIDYeast Plus(RYP)系统在鉴定临床常见酵母中的作用。方法:将所试菌株在沙氏培养基上传代2次,然后30℃孵育24-48h后,用RYP系统进行试验。结果:150株临床分离株中有139株被正确鉴定到种的水平;有8株得到了具有2种或2种以上可能性的鉴定结果,而在使用了附加试验后都得出了正确的鉴定结果;有3株鉴定错误。RYP系统在不用附加试验的情况下鉴定的准确率达到92%,采用附加试验后鉴定的准确率达到98%。结论:RYP系统适用于临床微生物实验室的常规鉴定,在不需要特殊仪器的条件下,就能准确地鉴定临床上40多种酵母菌和酵母样菌。 Objective :To study the role of RaplDYeast Plus (RYP) system in identifying common clinical yeasts. Methods.. The target strains were cultured and passaged twice on Sabouraud dextrose agar, and were fed to RYP system after 24-48 h incubation at 30℃. Results.. One hundred and thirty-nine of the 150 target strains Were identified to the level of species correctly, and 8 undetermined strains were confirmed by additional tests. It was found that 3 strains had been incorrectly identified by RYP system. The accuracy of RYP system was calculated as 92 % without additional tests and 98 % with additional tests. Conclusion.. RYP system is suitable for routine tests in clinical microbiological laboratory; it can accurately identify more than 40 kinds of yeasts and yeast-like bacteria in clinical practice.
出处 《第二军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期215-216,共2页 Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
关键词 RapIDYeast Plus系统 酵母菌 临床应用 微生物 RapiD Yeast Plus system yeasts
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Heela JS,Sotomayor E,Coon K,et al.Comparison of the RaPIDYeast Plus panel with the API20c yeast system for identification of clinically significant isolates of candida species[J].J Clin Microbiol,1998,36:1443-1445.
  • 2Kitch TT,Jacobs MR,McGinnis MR,et al.Ability of RaPID Yeast Plus system to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours[J].J Clin Microbiol,1996,34:1069-1071.
  • 3Fenn JP,Segal H,Barland B,et al.Comparison of updated Vitek yeast biochemical card and API20c yeast identification systems[J].J Clin Microbiol,1994,32:1184-1187.

同被引文献8

  • 1徐红,温海.临床常见酵母菌的特征和鉴定[J].中国真菌学杂志,2006,1(5):304-307. 被引量:2
  • 2Leaw SN, Chang HC, Sun HF, et al. Identification of medically important yeast species by sequence analysis of the internal tran- scribed spacer regions [ J ]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006,44 ( 3 ) : 693- 699.
  • 3Land GA, Salkin IF, el-Zaatari M, et al. Evaluation of the Baxter- MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1991,29 (4) :718-722.
  • 4Espinel-Ingroff A, Stockman L, Roberts G, et, al. Comparison of RapiD yeast plus system with API 20C system for identification of common, new, and emerging yeast pathogens[ J]. J Clin Micro- bio1,1998,36(4) :883-886.
  • 5McGinnis MR, Molina TC, Pierson DL,et al. Evaluation of the Biolog MicroStation system for yeast identification. [J]. J Med Vet Mycol, 1996,34 ( 5 ) :349-352.
  • 6Marklein G, Josten M, Klanke U, et al. Matrix-assisted laser de- sorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for fast and re- liable identification of clinical yeast isolates[ J]. J Clin Microbi- ol,2009,47(9) :2912-2917.
  • 7OHara CM. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram negative bacilli [ J ]. J Clin Microbio1,2006,44 ( 3 ) :928-933.
  • 8Pincus DH, Orenga S, Chatellier S. Yeast identification-past, present, and future methods [ J ]. Med Mycol,2007,45 ( 2 ) :97- 121.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部