摘要
从实行行为的定型性和刑法设置身份犯的特定目的看,无特定身份者不能构成真正身份犯的实行犯;从权利义务相一致的原则看,无特定身份者也不能构成真正身份犯的教唆犯和帮助犯。而从满足司法实践需要、预防犯罪、镇压犯罪等维护社会秩序的角度考虑,笔者也赞成无身份者可以构成真正身份犯的共同犯罪。前者体现了对个人自由的保障,后者体现了对社会秩序的维护,不同的选择体现了刑法对不同价值的追求。
From the viewpoint of fixation of direct behavior and special purpose of status crime set by criminal law, persons without special status can not be the direct criminal in standard status crime; From the viewpoint of correspondence of right and obligation, persons without special status can not be the abettor and accessory in standard status crime. From the viewpoint of judicature, prevention of crime and suppression of crime, the auther thinks person without special status can be the direct criminal.abettor and accessory in standard status crime. The former indicates the safeguard for individual freedom and the latter indicates the protection of society order, which show different preference to value.
出处
《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2006年第2期17-20,共4页
Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词
共同犯罪
构成身份
价值选择
理性思考
joint crimes
standard status
the choice of value
rational thought
