摘要
目的:了解我国主办的两种男科学期刊引文引用规律及情报吸收能力,发现我国男科学研究领域科研人员的文献需求特征,为该学科研究人员查阅文献提出建议。方法:采用引文计量分析法统计《中华男科学杂志》(以下简称NJA)与《Asian Journal of Andrology》(以下简称AJA)2004年刊载的论文所引用的参考文献从引文数量、引文类型、引文年代、普赖斯指数、自引率、高被引期刊等几个方面进行了比较分析。结果:AJA和NJA篇均引文数分别为20.43和10.18条,期刊占引文比例为95.84%和93.00%;AJA和NJA的普赖斯指数分别为38.50%和55.01%,自引率分别为6.20%和5.82%,AJA和NJA分别引用了358种和725种期刊,引用前12种期刊占期刊引用的比例42.47%和37.41%。结论:AJA与NJA引文类型以期刊为主,NJA涉猎文献范围广,引用文献比较新,专业人员利用新文献能力较强,作者能紧跟本学科的发展。AJA篇均引文数较高,引用文献半衰期较长,引用期刊相对集中。
Objective ： To analyze the distribution pattern of the references in National Journal ofAndrology （NJA） and Asian Journal ofAndrology （AJA） , and evaluate the ability of information collection and the characteristics of literatures requested by scientists of andrology. Methods ： The citation analysis was used to analyze the references cited by articles published on the two journals, including the number, type and publication year of references, and Price Index, self-citing rate of the two journals and top cited journals were analyzed individually. Results ： The average numbers of references per article in AJA and NJA were 20.43 and 10.18 respectively, and the percentages of journals cited by the two journals were 95.84% and 93%. The Price indices were 38.50 % and 55.01% , and selfciting rates were 6.20% and 5.82% for the two journals respectively. There were 358 and 725 journals cited by AJA and NJA, the top 12 of which provided 42.47% and 37.41% of all references respectively. Conclusion ： The main reference type was journal. NJA cited more disciplines than AJA did, and it cited more current publications. The result shows authors in NJA can use latest articles and keep abreast of progress in andrology. AJA had more references and relatively concentrated cited journal categories, and citing half-life of AJA was longer than that of NJA.
出处
《中华男科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2006年第1期86-88,92,共4页
National Journal of Andrology
关键词
男科学
参考文献
引文分析
andrology
medical literature
citation analysis
