3[1]Zaldivar R, Ricur G, Oscherow S. The phakic intraocular lens implant:in-depth focus on posterior chamber phakic IOLs. Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2000; 11:22-34
4[2]Ehlers N, Bramesn T, Sperling S. Applanation tomometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol, 1975;53:34-43
5[3]Foster PJ, Bassanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology, 1998;105:969-973
6[4]Emara B, Probst LE, Tingey DP, Kennedy DW, Willms LJ, Machat J.Correlation of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in normal myopic eyes and after laser in situ keratomileusis.J Cataract Refract Surg,1998;24:1320-1325
7[5]Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol, 1997;123:767-772
8[6]Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Mller JP, Parrish RK 2nd, Wilson MR, Kass MA. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 2002;20:714-720
9[7]Ehlers N, Hansen FK. Central corneal thickness in low-tension glaucoma.Acta Ophthalmol, 1974;52:740-746
10[8]Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M. Tonometry after laser in si tu keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma, 2001;10:261-265