期刊文献+

来氟米特在狼疮性肾炎维持治疗中的疗效观察——中期研究报告 被引量:17

A randomized trial of maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis with leflunomide and tripterygium
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨来氟米特(leflunomide,LEF)在狼疮性肾炎(LN)维持治疗中的疗效及安全性,并与雷公藤多甙(tripterygium,TW)进行比较。方法:2004年6月至2005年8月经诱导治疗获得临床完全缓解的122例LN患者(Ⅱ型24例、Ⅲ型9例、Ⅳ型65例、Ⅴ型24例),女性116例,男性6例,平均年龄(29.6±8.3)岁,按病理类型随机分为LEF组(n=61)和TW组(n=61),两组患者在性别、年龄、病理类型分布、诱导治疗方案等无差异。统计随访24月。本研究初步评价随访6月以上患者的复发率、副作用发生率统计所有病例。结果:①LEF组有14例(23.0%)退出,原因主要为为皮疹(9.8%)、腹泻(3.3%)、白细胞减少(3.3%)和肝功能异常(1.6%),TW组3例(4.9%)退出。随访时间超过6个月的患者67例,LEF组31例(随访时间6~14个月),TW组36例(随访时间为6~16个月)。②LEF组3例(9.7%)复发(1例在第5月出现肾外复发,2例分别在第7、14个月出现肾病复发),TW组5例(13.9%)复发(1例在第6个月出现肾外复发,4例分别在第3、6、8、14个月出现肾病复发)。③副作用:LEF组21例(34.4%)出现副作用,包括脱发(7例)、皮疹(9例)、白细胞下降(2例)、肝酶升高(4例),腹泻(3例)和停经(1例);TW组16例(26.2%)出现副作用,其中白细胞下降(1例)、肝酶升高(4例)和停经(11例)。结论:在维持治疗超过6个月的患者中,LEF维持治疗的疗效与TW相当,对月经的影响明显低于TW组。LEF组皮疹的发生率显著高于TW组,因而退出研究的比例高于TW组。LEF维持治疗的疗效还需长期随访评价。 Objective: To study the efficacy and side effects of low-dose prednisolone combined leflunomide (LEF) or Tripterygium (TW) for the maintenance therapy in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). Methodology:One hundred and twenty two patients of LN (WHO type Ⅱ24, type Ⅲ 9, type Ⅳ 65, and type Ⅴ 24 cases)with complete remission by induced therapy were recruited from Jun. 2004 to Aug. 2005. They were 116 female and 6 male with a average age of ( 29.6 ± 8.3 ) years old, and randomized into the LEF group ( n = 61 ) or the TW group ( n = 61 ). Both of them were no difference in sex, age, WHO classification, and induction therapy. All patients were follow-up 24 months. The primary evaluation was performed on efficacy and side effects. Results:①There were 67 cases follow-up ≥6 months, 31 from the LEF group ( follow-up 6 to 14 months) , and 36 from the TW group ( follow-up 6 to 16 months). 14 cases(23.0% ) withdrew from the LEF grnup, maintv because of rash, diarrhea, leucopenia, and liver dysfunction, which was significantly higher than that of the TW group (4. 9% ). ②The relapses were observed in patients follow-up ≥6 months in both groups, with 3 cases (9.7%) belong to the LEF group ( one was extra-renal relapsed on 5 months, and 2 were renal relapsed on 7, 14 months separately) , and 5 ( 13.9% ) in the TW group (one was extra-renal relapsed, and 4 were renal relapsed). ③ The side effects were evaluated in all recruited patients. The total side effect rate in the LEF group was 34. 4%. However, the rate of the TW group was just 26.2%. Conclusion:LEF had the same efficacy as TW in the LN maintenance therapy in those follow-up ≥6 months patients, and it had weak effect on menses. The rate of rash increased significantly in the LEF group, as well as higher withdrawal numbers. The effect of LEF on LN maintenance therapy may require long-term follow-up study.
出处 《肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 2005年第6期514-519,共6页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology,Dialysis & Transplantation
关键词 狼疮性肾炎 来氟米特 雷公藤多甙 治疗 副作用 lupus nephritis leflunomide tripterygium maintenance therapy side effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Contreras G,Tozman E,Nahar N.Maintenance therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis:mycophenolate mofetil,azathioprine and intravenous clophosphamide.Lupus,2005,14 (Suppl 1):s33-38.
  • 2Sidiropoulos PI,Kritikos HD,Boumpas DT.Upus nephritis flares.Lupus,2005,14(1):49-52.
  • 3Nossent HC,Koldingsnes W.Long-term efficacy of azathioprine treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis.Rheumatology (Oxford),2000,39(9):969-974.
  • 4Chan TM,Tse KC,Tang CS,et al.Long-term outcome of patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis treated with prednisolone and oral clophosphamide followed by azathioprine Lupus,2005,14 (4):265-272.
  • 5Chan TM,Tse KC Tang CS,et al.Long-term study of mycophenolate mofetil as continuous induction and maintenance treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus.J Am Soc Nephrol,2005,16:1076-1084.
  • 6黎磊石 张训.雷公藤治疗肾小球肾炎的临床研究[J].中华内科杂志,1981,20:216-216.
  • 7唐政 黎磊石 周惠忠.雷公藤治疗狼疮性肾炎对性激素水平的影响[J].江苏医药,1997,12:653-654.
  • 8Green S,Watanabe K,Braatz-Trulson J.Inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase by the immunosuppressive agent leflunnomide.Biochem Pharmacol,1995,50 (6):861-867.
  • 9Siemasko KF,Chong AS,Willams JW,et al.Regulation of B call function by the immunosuppressive agent leflunomide.Transplantion,1996,61 (4):635-642.
  • 10Xu X,Williams JW,Bremer EG,et al.Inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphorylation in T cells by a novel immunosuppressive agent,leflunomide.J Biol Chem,1995,270(21):12398-12403.

二级参考文献14

  • 1王勇雄,中华肾脏病杂志,1987年,3卷,19页
  • 2Flanc RS, Roberts MA, Strippoli GF, et al.Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Am J Kidney Dis,2004,43:197-208.
  • 3Breedveld FC, Dayer JM.Leflunomide: mode of action in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis, 2000,59:841-849.
  • 4Li EK, Tam LS, Tomlinson B.Leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Clin Ther,2004,26: 447-459.
  • 5Remer CF, Weisman MH, Wallace DJ.Benefits of leflunomide in systemic lupus erythematosus: a pilot observational study.Lupus,2001,10:480-483.
  • 6Tam LS, Li EK, Wong CK, et al.Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of leflunomide in systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus,2004,13:601-604.
  • 7Levey AS, Lan SP, Corwin HL, et al.Progression and remission of renal disease in the Lupus Nephritis Collaborative Study. Results of treatment with prednisone and short-term oral cyclophosphamide.Ann Intern Med,1992,116:114-123.
  • 8Smolen JS, Kalden JR, Scott DL, et al.Efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. European Leflunomide Study Group.Lancet,1999,353:259-266.
  • 9Kalden JR, Schattenkirchner M, Sorensen H, et al.The efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a five-year followup study.Arthritis Rheum,2003,48:1513-1520.
  • 10胡伟新,唐政,姚小丹,陈惠萍,樊小兵,刘志红,黎磊石.双倍剂量雷公藤多甙治疗原发性肾病综合征的近期疗效[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,1997,6(3):210-214. 被引量:119

共引文献375

同被引文献186

引证文献17

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部