摘要
以劳动生产率的不同度量方法为出发点,分析了绝对优势和比较优势的判定标准,同时解释了中国劳动生产率高低之争的原因。通过分析,得出的结论主要有:中国的劳动生产率之争源自劳动生产率度量方法的差异;绝对优势理论和比较优势理论并不矛盾,绝对优势是比较优势的前提,可分别由价值量方法度量的劳动生产率和实物量劳动生产率作出判定;中国的劳动成本优势主要来自于低廉的劳动工资水平,且与部分发展中国家相比并不具有优势。而根据要素价格均等定理及实证检验数据,中国的劳动成本优势将很难持久。要想保持这一优势,必须提高劳动者效率和增加值率。
Based on the different way of labor productivity measurement, the paper analyzed the criterion for absolute advantage and comparative advantage, at same time, explained the cause of argument on the labor productivity level. The conclusion included： the argument on the labor productivity stem from different measurement methods; No conflict between absolute advantage and comparative advantage, and the former is the premise for the latter. The labor cost advantage mainly came from the lower salary level, and didn＇t maintain advantage compared with other countries. Based on the factor price equalization theorem and empirical data, Chinese labor cost advantage wouldn＇t last longer. To keep such advantage, it＇s necessary to improve the labor productivity and value-added rate.
出处
《云南财贸学院学报》
2006年第1期54-59,共6页
Journal of Yunnan Finance and Trade Institute
关键词
劳动生产率
比较优势
要素价格均等定理
Labor Productivity
Comparative Advantage
Factor Price Equalization
