期刊文献+

精益与6σ的比较研究 被引量:17

A Comparative Study of Six-σ and Lean Manufacturing
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对精益制造和6σ这两种卓越的业务改进方法进行了比较研究。从各方法本身的演化发展及性质上作了比较,得出二者的共性及各方法的独特性,再从各方法的特点、组织文化和过程方法角度进行了比较,分析各自的优势和不足之处,揭示了两种方法本质的一致性和过程方法的互补性,为两种方法的完美结合提供了基础支撑。 This paper carries out a comparative study of six-σ and lean manufacturing, which are two well-known methods for business improvement. Their common ground, unique characteristics, advantages and disadvantages are identified, which demonstrates their consistency and the complementarity to each other. Foundations are provided for using the two approaches together.
作者 何桢 张志红
出处 《工业工程》 2006年第1期1-4,共4页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70372062) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-04-0240)
关键词 精益制造 持续质量改进 比较研究 Six-σ lean manufacturing continuous quality improvement comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Roger Weiss.A Tale of lean Presentation[J]. IIE Solutions, Focus. 2001.33(1) :52.
  • 2[美]马特·巴尼 汤姆·麦卡锡 摩托罗拉大学译.总裁读:新六西格玛[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.10-12.
  • 3Chang Tsung-Ling. Six Sigma:A Framework for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to Achieve Total Quality [ D]. Cleveland,Ohio: Cleveland State University, 2002: 2-4.
  • 4Richard B Chase, Nicholas J A Quilano, F Robert Jacobs. Production and Operation Management: Manufacturing and Services[ M].8th ed[影印版].北京:机械工业出版社, 1998: 324-349.
  • 5Womak J P, Jones D T, Roos D. The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production[ M]. New York: Harper Collins, 1990:48-50.
  • 6Krafcik J F. Triumph of the Lean Production System[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1988,30( 1 ) : 41-52.
  • 7Lee Kuo Hang. Critical Success Factors of Six Sigma Implementation and the Impact on Operations Performance[ D]. Cleveland,Ohio: Cleveland State University, 2002: 2-39.
  • 8Bowen D E, William E Y."Lean" service:In Defense of A Production-Line Approach[J]. International Journal of Service, Industry Management, 1998,9 (3) : 207-225.
  • 9Womack J P, Jones D T. lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation[ M]. New York: Simon & Schuster,1996:15-90.
  • 10Goh T N. A Strategic Assessment of Six Sigma [ J ]. Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int, 2002,18(2) :403-410.

同被引文献74

引证文献17

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部