摘要
就戴震进四库馆后与钱载发生激烈争执一事,追溯钱戴争执的缘起,在乾隆三十一、二年,戴震曾因议论朱彝尊《经义考》而招致钱载极大不满。馆中的争执,不是双方交恶的开始,而是交恶的持续和总爆发。从中可见戴震在治学方向上的自觉及考据学的高涨所引起的社会反映,同时也能看到朱彝尊在乾隆年间北京学人中的显著影响。
By tracing back to Qian Zai＇s quarrel with Dai Zhen after being enrolled into the Imperial Library, this essay probes into the origin of the disagreement with each other. The author points out that the resentfulness of Qian Zai was caused due to Dai Zhen＇s reproach for A Textual Research for Classics by Zhu Yi-zun at 31-32 of Emperor Qianlong, thus beginning their endless disputes and the break-out of the quarrel in the Imperial Library. And the fact shows both the high tide of textual researches in the society and Zhu Yi-zun＇s great influence on Beijing scholars during the ruling of Qianlong.
出处
《上海大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第1期92-98,共7页
Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
