期刊文献+

湖库富营养化敏感分级水动力概率参数研究 被引量:29

Study of the Hydrodynamic Probability Parameters on Eutrophication Sensitivity Classification of Lake and Reservoirs
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 鉴于按多年平均流量估计滞留时间进行富营养化敏感程度分类较为粗糙,在月平均尺度上,考虑径流量的概率分布,提出了滞留率、缓流率、倒灌保证率等新的水动力概率参数反映水体动力特征,使水体富营养化敏感程度的识别及分级建立在考虑年内变化及多年变化的基础之上,使之在敏感分级上有更高的分辨率。并以三峡水库为实例,进行了不同支流的水体水动力概率参数的计算。结果显示,不同支流水体间的敏感水动力概率参数有明显差别,依据水动力条件等因素对水体富营养化控制实施差别化管理是必要的。 In traditional way, water bodies are classified according to the residence time, which is estimated based on the multi-year average flowthrough, and the eutrophication sensitivity degrees of lakes reservoirs are evaluated. In this research, in consideration of probability distribution of flow-through, some new hydrodynamic probability parameters, including retention ratio, sluggish flow ratio and back flowing guarantee ratio, are proposed to represent the hydrodynamic futures of water bodies at monthly scale. With these parameters, the identification and classification of eutrophication sensitivity degrees can be established on the basis of considering both seasonal and multi-year variations, and the sensitivity hierarchy has higher resolution. A case study is conducted in the Three Gorges Reservoir, and the hydrodynamic probability parameters in some tributaries are calculated. The results indicate that parameters in different tributaries have obvious differences, and it is necessary to implement distinctive management of eutrophication according to different hydrodynamic conditions.
作者 富国
出处 《环境科学研究》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第6期80-84,102,共6页 Research of Environmental Sciences
基金 国家"十五"科技攻关计划项目(2003BA614-04) 国家环境保护总局2003年重点科研项目
关键词 富营养化 湖库 河流 滞留率 缓流率 倒灌保证率 倒灌系数 eutrophication lake and reservoir river retention ratio sluggish flow ratio back flowing guarantee ratio back flowing coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Strskraba M, Tundisi J G. Guidelines of lake management: Reservoir water quality management ( Vol. 9) [M]. Shiga Japan: International Lake Environment Committee, 1999. 66.
  • 2USEPA. Technical support document for water quality-based toxics control (EPA/505/2-90-001 PB91-127415) [R]. Washington D C: US EPA , 1991. 73-74.
  • 3中央環境審議會水環境部會陸域環境基準專門委員會.人工湖沼の湖沼類型指定について[A].(第5回)議事次第,資料4-1[R].[s.1.]:[s.n.],平成 15年.11-12.Central Environmental Council, Water Environment Research Council,Special Commission on Terrestrial Environment. To specify the type of false swamp[A]. Information 4 - 1 of the fifthmeeting [R]. [s.l.]: [s.n.],2003. 11 - 12.
  • 4李崇明,张晟,龚宇,等.乌江"黑潮"现象原因及影响分析[A],黄真理,李锦秀,廖文根,等.中国环境水力学2002[C].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2002.332-337.
  • 5SL278-2002.水利水电工程水文计算规范[S].[S].,..
  • 6Orlod G T. Mathematical modeling of water quality: stream, lakes and reservoirs[ M]. IIASA, Great Britian: Pitman Press, 1983. 228 - 230.
  • 7三峡水库水污染控制课题技术领导小组.三峡水库水污染控制研究总报告(下册)[R].北京:三峡水利委员会,2003.403.

共引文献63

同被引文献388

引证文献29

二级引证文献514

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部