期刊文献+

可行走式分娩镇痛对胎儿血氧饱和度的影响 被引量:4

Effects of ambulatory labor analgesia on fetal oxygen saturation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨可行走式分娩镇痛对胎儿血氧饱和度的影响。方法选取60例足月待产病例,其中30例行罗哌卡因+舒芬太尼复合的腰硬联合镇痛即可行走式分娩镇痛,30例自然分娩组产程中不使用任何药物镇痛。在活跃期进行胎儿血氧饱和度的监护,记录第一产程活跃期、第二产程胎儿血氧饱和度值及胎儿血氧饱和度最低值。胎儿出生后立即抽取脐动脉血进行血脐分析,记录pH值和BE值。结果可行走式分娩镇痛组和自然分娩组比较:第一产程活跃期胎儿血氧饱和度分别为(51.92±5.90)%和(50.77±6.47)%(P=0.48),第二产程胎儿血氧饱和度分别为(44.85±6.27)%和(43.12±7.34)%(P=0.32);胎儿血氧饱和度最低值分别为(41.63±7.51)%和(40.96±7.48)%(P=0.73)。结论可行走式分娩镇痛对产程中胎儿血氧饱和度无影响。 Objective To observe the effect of ambulatory labor analgesia on fetal oxygen saturation during labor. Methods Sixty parturients with uncomplicated term pregnancies were equally divided, according to their personal preference, into ambulatory analgesia group receiving combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia and control group without analgesia administration. All the parturients with ambulatory labor analgesia received sufentanil and ropivacaine administration. Fetal oxygen saturation was monitored continuously during the labor by recording the values every 5 minutes and the mean value was calculated. Umbilical blood was analyzed aider fetal delivery and the pH, base excess (BE) value were recorded. Results In the analgesia group and the control group, the mean values of fetal oxygen saturation was (51.92±5.90) % and (50.77±6.47) %, respectively, during the first labor stage (P=0.48), and was (44.85±6.27) % and (43.12±7.34) % during the second labor stage (P=0.32), and the lowest values during the labor was (41.63±7.51 ) % and (40.96±7.48) %, respectively (P=0.73), showing no significant differences in the three values between the two groups. Conclusion Ambulatory labor analgesia does not significantly affect fetal oxygen saturation during the entire course of labor.
出处 《第一军医大学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第12期1507-1510,共4页 Journal of First Military Medical University
基金 广东省重大社会问题联合攻关项目(ZKB04701S)~~
关键词 分娩镇痛 可行走式 胎儿血氧饱和度 血气分析 罗哌卡因 舒芬太尼 labor analgesia ambulatory fetal oxygen saturation umbilical blood analysis ropivacaine sufentanil
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Committee on Fetus and Newborn,American Academy of Pediatrics,and Committee on Obstetric Practice,American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Use and abuse of the Apgar score [J].Pediatrics,1996,98(1):141-2.
  • 2Carter BS,Haverkamp AD,Merenstein GB.The definition of acute perinatal asphyxia [J ].Clin Perinatol,1993,20(2):287-304.
  • 3Dildy GA,Clark SL,Garite TJ,et al.Current status of the multicenter randomized clinical trial on fetal oxygen saturation monitoring in the United States [J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,1997,72 (Suppl):S43-S50.
  • 4Yam J,Chua S,Arulkumaran S.Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry.Part 1:Principles and technical issues [J].Obstet Gynecol Surv,2000,55(3):163-72.
  • 5US Department of health and Human Services.Rates of cesarean delivery-United States [ J ].MMWR,1991,41:285-9.
  • 6ACOG.ACOG Committee Opinion.Number 258,September 2001.Fetal pulse oximetry.Et [ J ].Obstet Gynecol,2001,98(3):523-4.
  • 7Yam J,Chua S,Arulkumaran S.Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry.Part 2:Clinical application [J].Obstet Gynecol Surv,2000,55(3):173-83.
  • 8McNamara H,Chung DC,Lilford R,et al.Do fetal pulse oximetry readings at delivery correlate with cord blood oxygenation and acidaemia [ J ] ? Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1992,99(9):735-8.
  • 9McNamara HM,Dildy GA.Continuous intrapartum pH,PO2,PCO2,and SpO2 monitoring[J].Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am,1999,26(4):671-93.
  • 10Carbonne B,Langer B,Goffinet F,et al.Multi-center study on the clinical value of fetal pulse oximetry [J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1997,177:593-8.

二级参考文献24

  • 1[1]Dildy GA. The physiologic and medical rationale for intrapartum fetal monitoring. Biomed Instrum Technol, 1999, 33(2): 143-151
  • 2[2]Dildy GA. The future of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 13(2):133-136
  • 3[3]Kuhnert M, Seelbach-Goebel B, Butterwegge M. Predictive agreement between the fetal arterial oxygen saturation and fetal scalp pH: results of the German multicenter study.Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 178(2):330-335
  • 4[4]Carbonne B, Langer B, Goffinet F, et al. Multicenter study on the clinical value of fetal pulse oximetry. Ⅱ. Compared predictive values of pulse oximetry and fetal blood analysis.The French Study Group on Fetal Pulse Oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 177(3):593-598
  • 5[5]Hasenburg A, Bauerle M, Waterman D, et al. European experience with a novel noninvasive sensor for intra-amniotic or extra-amniotic evaluation of fetal oxygen saturation. J Soc Gynecol Investig, 2003, 10(6):347-351
  • 6[6]Yam J, Chua S, Arulkumaran S. Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry. Part 2: Clinical application. Obstet Gynecol Smv,2000, 55(3):173-183
  • 7[7]Siristatidis C, Salamalekis E, Vitoratos N, et al. Intrapartum surveillance of IUGR fetuses with cardiotocography and fetal pulse oximetry. Biol Neonate, 2003, 83(3):162-165
  • 8[8]Thorp JA, Rushing RS. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 1999, 26(4):695-709
  • 9[9]McNamara H, Chung DC, Lifford R, et al. Do fetal pulse oximetry readings at delivery correlate with cord blood oxygenation and acidaemia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1992,99(9):735-738
  • 10[10]Langer B, Boudier E, Haddad J, et al. Fetal pulse oximetry during labor of 62 patients. Fetal Diagn Ther,1996, 11(1):37-45

共引文献4

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部