摘要
目的比较三种持续膀胱冲洗方法的临床效果。方法采用信封法将90例持续膀胱冲洗的病人随机分为3组,分别采用单瓶输液器、四联三通及三升输液袋膀胱冲洗方法。结果3组尿细菌培养检出率,尿红细胞计数及冲洗液残留量无显著差异(P>0.05),操作时间有显著差异(P>0.05),耗材费用明显不同。结论四联三通膀胱冲洗器具有省时、经济、方便、实用,减少护士工作量,准确地记录冲洗量的优点,有推广于临床应用的价值。
Objective To compare clinical effect of continuous bladder irrigation of three methods. Methods 90 patients were divided randomly into three groups by the way of pick envelope： the ＂single bottle infusion＂ group, the ＂four linking of three connecting＂ ＂group and the＂ 3 liters infusion bag＂ group. Results There were no significant differences among three groups in urinate culture results, red blood cell number in urine and remainder volume of irrigation （P〉0.05）, but there was. significant difference among them in operating time （P〈0.05）. Conclusions ＂Four linking of three connecting＂ used in bladder irrigation can save time and is convenient and records the irrigation volume correctly, so it is worth using clinically.
出处
《现代护理》
2005年第23期1965-1967,共3页
Modern Nursing
基金
2003~2004年度成都市卫生局重大科研课题(编号:03)
关键词
持续膀胱冲洗
方法
护理
Bladder irrigation ＂Four linking of three connecting＂ bladder irrigation instrument Nursing
