摘要
民事审判改革是二十年来民事诉讼理论和实践共同关注的课题。审判改革的实践为民事诉讼理论的发展提供了素材和机遇,民事诉讼理论为审判改革进行方向性的指引。但是,把纯粹的当事人主义诉讼模式和纯粹的程序公正等作为理想目标来进行制度建构,以改革职权主义的诉讼模式,却忽视了相关的理念和制度配合,造成了审判权的缺位与失范,现实与理想的距离越来越远。为此,理论上必须重新审视民事诉讼理念,通过确认审判权力和审判义务、承认法官独立等途径实现审判权之规制,完成中国版民事诉讼理论体系建构。
Both the scholars and judges all take the reform on civil procedure as an important topic in the recent twenty years. Cases and judges＇ practice offer scholars materials and opportunities to do research while scholars＇ research help judges find the direction of the reformation of the civil procedure. However, while taking the absolute adversary system and pure due process as a goal to make systematic construction and to reform the litigious mode of ex officio doctrine, relevant concepts and systems were ignored, which led to the ineit3ciency and disorganization of the judicial power, and the enlarging gap between reality and ideal. Therefore, civil procedure concepts have to be reviewed to build the theoretic system of civil procedure with Chinese characters by realizing the rule of judicial power such as establishing judicial power and responsibilities, and recognizing judges＇ independence.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第6期44-55,共12页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
审判权
中国
民事诉讼
程序公正
法官
Civil Procedure
Judicial Power
Inefficiency
Disorganization
