摘要
上诉死刑案件审理方式的选择对死刑裁判准确性的实现具有决定性的意义。基于保障人权、诉求公正、贯彻死刑政策、实现上诉审职能方面的考虑,应当改革由于司法资源的有限、法律规定的疏漏、对生命权的漠视等原因造成的实践中第二审法院规避开庭审而大量以书面审或者调查讯问审的方式审结上诉死刑案件的做法。实现上诉死刑案件开庭审的普遍化,需要从理念到制度的转变与重构。
The choice of the mode of the appellate death penalty trial plays a decisional role in the accuracy of the death penalty trial. Basing on the protection of the human rights, the justice of the appeal, the fulfillment of the trial function, we should consider some other factors, such as the lacking of judicial resource, the missing of legal regulation and the indifference to the living right, which cause the secondary court uses paper trial rather than real hearing trial. So we can accomplish the transmission from legal ideology to system.
出处
《政法论丛》
2005年第6期74-77,共4页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
死刑
上诉审
开庭审
death penalty
appellate trial
opening trial
