摘要
目的:评价中西药3种方案治疗突发性耳聋的疗效及成本-效果。方法:将85例突发性耳聋患者分成3组,A组给予盐酸丁咯地尔治疗(30例),B组给予复方丹参治疗(28例),C组给予灯盏花治疗(27例),观察3组疗效,并进行成本-效果分析。结果:A、B、C组成本分别为1908·20元、1102·68元、1825·64元;有效率分别为93·33%、60·71%、70·37%;成本-效果比分别为20·45元、18·16元、25·94元;在B组的基础上每增加1个单位效果,A组所需追加的成本为24·73元,而C组为74·84元。结论:A方案为较佳方案。
OBJECTIVE：, To compare the therapeutic effects and cost- effectiveness among 3 therapeutic regimens. METHODS： 85 cases with sudden deafness were divided into 3 groups： Group A （n = 30） were ascribed to receive buflomedil, Group B （n = 28） to receive compound Danshen and Group C （n = 27） to receive Herba Erigerontis. The curative effects of the 3 were observed and the cost- effectiveness of which were analyzed. RESULTS：The costs of theg（A, B and C） were 1908.20yuan, 1 102.68yuan and 1 825.64yuan, respectively. The effective rates of the 3 were 93.33%, 60.71% and 70.37%, respectively. The cost - effectiveness ratios were 20.45yuan, 18.16yuan and 25.94yuan, respectively. As compared with Group B, the incremental costs for Group A and C were 24.73yuan and 74.84yuan, respectively with every one - unit effectiveness increase. CONCLUSION ：Group C is the superior one among the 3 therapeutic regimens.
出处
《中国药房》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第23期1793-1795,共3页
China Pharmacy
关键词
中药
西药
治疗方案
突发性耳聋
成本-效果分析
Traditional Chinese medicine
Western medicine
Therapeutic regimen
Sudden deafness
Cost -effectiveness analysis
