期刊文献+

单倍剂量三维动态增强MR肾动脉造影 被引量:4

Single-dose three-dimensional,dynamic,contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:评价单倍剂量三维动态增强MR肾动脉造影(3D DCE-MRA)的图像质量及临床应用价值。方法:60例疑肾动脉狭窄的患者,随机分为A、B两组(各30例)。预先推注1ml钆喷替酸葡甲胺(Gd-DTPA)测定对比剂循环时间,用三维快速小角度激发序列(3D FLASH)检查A、B两组患者,A组用单倍剂量Gd-DTPA(平均0.11mmol/kg体重),B组用双倍剂量Gd-DTPA(平均0.2mmol/kg体重)。比较A、B两组原始图像的信噪比和对比噪声比以及最大信号投影图像的质量。结果:A、B组的肾动脉信噪比为45.3±17.2和49.6±20.1,对比噪声比为37.6±15.6和39.7±18.5,两者差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。两组MIP图像质量差异无显著性意义。单倍剂量3D DCE-MRA显示了12例(14条)肾动脉狭窄。结论:单倍剂量三维动态增强MR肾动脉造影图像清晰,能满足临床诊断需要。 Objective:To evaluate the image quality and chnical value of single-dose three-dimensoinal dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography (3D DCE-MRA) of the renal arteries.Methods: Sixty patients suspected of renal artery stenosis were divided randomly into group A (n = 30) and group B (n= 30). Three-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequences (FLASH) was performed after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (average dose, group A 0.11 mmol/kg; group B 0.2mmol/kg). Synchronization of contrast material administration with data acquisition was achieved with a 1-ml test dose of contrst material to estimate circulation time of contrast agent. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the source images of group A and group B were compared. The image quality of maximum intensity projection (MIP) was assessed. Results: The SNRs in the renal artery were 45.3 ± 17.2( group A) and 49.6 ± 20.1 (group B). The CNRs were 37.6± 15.6 ( group A) and 39.7 ±18.5 ( group B). There were no significant differences ( P 〉 0.05). No statistically significant difference in MIP image quality between two groups was found,too, In 12 cases, 14 stenosed renal arteries were identified with single-dose 3D DCE-MRA. Conclusion: Single-dose 3D DCE-MRA of the renal arteries can clearly reveal renal arteries and fully meet clinical diagnostic demand.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2005年第11期967-970,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 衢州市科技局科研基金资助项目(编号:20031077)
关键词 磁共振成像 血管造影术 肾动脉 狭窄或闭塞 对比剂 Magnetic resonance image, angiography Renal artery, stenosis or obstruction Contrast agents
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Mittal TK, Evans C, Perkins T, et al. Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography: clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls[J]. Br J Radiol, 2001,74:495-502.
  • 2Gilfeather M, Yoon HC, Siegelman ES, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography[J].Radiology, 1999,210:367-372.
  • 3Masunaga H, Takehara Y, Isoda H, et al. Assessment of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional MR angiography for evaluating renal artery stenosis[J]. AJR, 2001,176:1213-1219.
  • 4Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF,et al.High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography[J].Radiology, 2001, 218:481-490.
  • 5Korst MBJM, Joosten FBM, Postma CT, et al. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries[J]. AJR, 2000,174:629-634.
  • 6Lee VS, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, et al. Single dose breath-hold gadolinium enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the renal arteries[J]. Radiology,1999, 211:69-78.
  • 7Mezrich R. A perspective on K-space[J].Radiology, 1995, 195:297-315.
  • 8Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, et al. Breath-hold single dose gadolinium enhanced three dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector[J]. Radiology, 1996,201:705-710.

同被引文献20

  • 1方佳,贾宁,吴晓明,冯祥太,汤艳萍,宋发亮,郭佑民.动态增强MRA在胸腹部大血管成像中的应用[J].实用放射学杂志,2004,20(9):854-855. 被引量:7
  • 2钱明珠,林伟,姜丽,黄敏华,王建梅,魏倩倩.三维增强磁共振血管成像在肾动脉造影中的应用[J].南方医科大学学报,2006,26(5):687-688. 被引量:2
  • 3徐亮,冯德朝,郑金勇,丛培新,孟祥水,田家凯,李传福,马祥兴.超高场强磁共振血管成像对颈部动脉病变的诊断价值[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2007,45(1):101-105. 被引量:3
  • 4Wilman AH,Riederer SJ,King BF.Fluoroscopically triggered contrast enhanced there-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries [J]. Radiology,1997,205(1):137-146.
  • 5Lee JJ,Chang Y,Kang DS. Contrast - enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: dose the test dose bolus represent the main dose bolus accurately[J].Korean J Radiol,2000, 1:91-97.
  • 6盛文.美FDA发布含钆类造影剂的公共卫生忠告[N].中国医药报,2006-08-22(A05).
  • 7黄清海,刘建民,洪波,许奕,赵文元,赵瑞.颈动脉狭窄支架成形术的长期疗效[J].中华神经外科杂志,2007,23(8):565-568. 被引量:13
  • 8Masumoto T,Hayashi N,Mori H,et al.Development of intraarterial contrast-enhanced 2D MRDSA with a 0.3 tesla open MRI system[J].Magn Reson Med Sci,2003,2:97-103.
  • 9Mohrs OK,Oberholzer K,Krummenauer F,et al.Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac vessels using a 1.0 molar contrast agent at 1.0T with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography[J].Rofo,2004,176:985-991.
  • 10Schoenberg SO,Rieger J,Weber CH,et al.High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions:comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US[J].Radiology,2005,235:687-698.

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部