期刊文献+

网络异常情况下BGP行为分析 被引量:2

Understanding BGP Behavior under Stress
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 BGP是域间路由协议事实上的标准,分析BGP的行为,尤其是在网络异常情况下的行为,非常重要。文章分析了发生在2001年9月的CodeRed/Nimda蠕虫攻击情况下的BGP行为。结果显示,攻击期间,监测点的BGP更新消息数是正常情况下的30倍。其中的40%是由于监测点自身的环境造成的。通过对消息进行分类的方法,我们更好地分析出了真正导致路由变化的更新消息。 BGP is the de-facto inter-domain routing protocol, and it is essential to understand how well BGP performs in the Internet,especially under stress.In this paper, we examin BGP's behavior during one stressful period, the Code Red/Nimda attack on September, 2001. The attack was correlated with a 30-fold increase in the BGP update messages at a monitoring point. Over 40% of the updates can be attributed to the monitoring artifact in current BGP measurement settings. To better understand the BGP behavior during the attack,we classify all the BGP updates into classes.
出处 《微电子学与计算机》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第12期127-130,共4页 Microelectronics & Computer
关键词 边界网关协议 对等体 蠕虫攻击 BGP行为 BGP, Peer, Worm attack, BGP behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Y Rekhter, T Li. Border Gateway Protocol 4. RFC 1771,July 1995.
  • 2Sandra Murphy. BGP Security Vulnerabilities Analysis.http://www. ietf. org/internet -drafts/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-vuln00.txt.
  • 3J Cowie, A Ogielski, B J Premore, et al. Global Routing Instabilities Triggered by Code Red Ⅱ and Nimda Worm Attacks. Tech. Rep, Renesys Corporation, Dec 2001.
  • 4RIPE. Routing Information Service Project. http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/np/ris-index.html.
  • 5Geoff Huston. Analyzing the Internet's BGP Routing Table.in Internet Protocol Journal, March 2001, 4(1).

同被引文献19

  • 1Rekhter Y, Li T, Hares S. A Border Gateway Protocol (BGP-4), IETF RFC 4271 [S]. Reston.. Internet Society, 2006.
  • 2Moy J. OSPF Version 2, IETF RFC 2328 [S]. Reston: Internet Society, 1998.
  • 3Shaikh A, Greenberg A. OSPF monitoring: Architecture, design, and deployment experience [C] //Proc of the 1st Syrup on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. Berkeley: USENIX, 2004:57-70.
  • 4Shaikh A, lsett C, Greenberg A, et al. A case study in OSPF behavior in a large enterprise network [C] //Proc of the 2nd ACM S1GCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop. New York: ACM, 2002:217-230.
  • 5Shu Z, Kadobayashi Y. Troubleshooting on intra domain routing instability [C] //Proc of ACM SIGCOMM 2004 Workshop. New York: ACM, 2004: 289-294.
  • 6Watson D, Jahanian F, Labovitz C. Experiences with monitoring OSPF on a regional service provider network [C] //Proc of the 23rd Int Conf on Distributed Computing Systems. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2003:204-213.
  • 7WuJ, Mao Z M, Rexford J, et al. Finding a needle in a haystack: Pinpointing significant BGP routing changes in an IP network [C] //Proc of the 2nd Syrup on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. Berkeley: USENIX, 2005 : 1-14.
  • 8Teixeira R, Rexford J. A measurement framework for pinpointing routing changes [C] //Proc of ACM SIGCOMM 2004 Workshop. New York: ACM, 2004:313-318.
  • 9Caesar M, Subramanian L, Katz R. Towards localizing root causes of BGP dynamics, UCB/CSD-04-1302 [R]. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, 2003.
  • 10Caesar M, Subramanian I., Katz R H. The case for an Internet health monitoring system [C] //Proc of the 1st Workshop on Hot Topics in System Dependability. Berkeley: USENIX, 2005.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部