摘要
对于辩护律师是否有独立的上诉权,学界有不少赞同的观点,这些观点从“控、辩双方的人员组成”,“容易耽误了上诉期间,使上诉落空”,“会使一审法院在审判活动中尽量避免错案,认真履行审判职能”,“辩护律师的主体地位”和“国内外立法及结合我国实践”等多方面论证了辩护律师具有独立的上诉权。本文针对这些观点加以质疑和剖析,得出的结论却是相反的。赋予辩护律师以独立的上诉权还不可避免的带来诸多弊端。
Regarding the independent appealing right of the defense counsel, there are many affirmative points in the academic circle. They demonstrate the necessity of the appealing right of the defense counsel through many aspects such as member formation of the prosecution and defense parties, the easy delay of an appeal, the avoidance of the wrong law cases, the subjective position of the defense counsel, and so on. However, through the analysis of those points, the article draws an opposite conclusion： if the law endows defense counsel the independent right, it can bring out many unavoidable problems, too.
出处
《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2005年第3期41-43,共3页
Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition
关键词
辩护律师
上诉权
控辩平衡
defense counsel
the right to appeal
balance of the prosecution and the defense
