期刊文献+

论投资者与东道国间争端解决机制及其影响 被引量:21

On the Dispute Settlement Mechanics between Investors and Relative States and its Influences
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年的国际投资协定中规定的投资者与东道国间投资争端解决机制,从实质看,是将此类争端解决进一步推向国际化。这种争端解决机制的国际化发展有助于强化投资者的保护,创造有利于吸引外资的投资气候,但它同时也是一把双刃剑,对于东道国关于外资的管理、社会和环境的管理、公共资源的利用都可能产生挑战并带来深远的影响。因此,我国在设计与利用国际仲裁机制时,应注意在国家主权的行使与投资者权利保护二者间达到平衡;应积极推动此类投资争端解决机制的改革和完善,妥善解决各种实体与程序问题,维护投资东道国政府为维护公共利益进行管理的权利。同时,还应尽可能地健全和完善能为外国投资者所信任的当地争端解决制度,尽可能地促使投资争端在当地解决。 The investor- state investment dispute settlement mechanism in recent BITs and FFAs tends to further internationalize the settlement of this kind of dispute. This mechanism is undoubtedly helpful to strengthen the protection of investor, create a favorable climate to attract foreign investment. However, the mechanism is also a dual - edge - sword, which may challenge and profoundly affect the host state' s regulation of foreign investment, society, environment and the utilization of the public resources. Thus when designing and utilizing the international arbitration mechanism, China should make a balance between the exercise of state' s sovereignty and the protection of the rights of foreign investors. It should be active to promote the reform and the improvement of investment dispute settlement mechanism, skillfully handle various substantive and procedure issues and maintain the right to regulate for public interests. Meanwhile, China should make efforts to improve and perfect the local dispute settlement mechanism so as to promote the local settlement of the investment dispute as much as possible.
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第5期175-184,共10页 China Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1David A. Gantz, The Evolution of FI'A Investment Provisions: From NAFFA to the United States - Chile Free Trade Agreement, 19 Am. U. Int'1 L. Rev., 679, 685.
  • 2.美国与智利间的《自由贸易协定》第10.15条以及第10.27条的定义[Z].,..
  • 3.《中国政府与芬兰政府关于鼓励与相互保护投资协定》第9条[Z].,..
  • 4S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada, 40 I.L.M. 1408, 1437 (NAFFA Arb. Trib. (Nov. 13, 2000);Metalclad corp. v. United Mexican States, 40 I.L. M. 36 (2001).
  • 5NAFFA Free Trade Commission, Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions 2 (2001) (clarifying that Article 1105 embodies the customary international law standard for determining possible violations of "fair and equitable treatment" and "full protection and security" ), available at http://www, naftaclahns, com/Papers/July% 2031% 202001%20NAFFA% 20FTC% 20Statement. pdf.
  • 6S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada, 40 I.L.M. 1408, 1437 (NAFTA Arb. Trib. (Nov. 13, 2000).
  • 7.[EB/OL].www. naftaclaims, com,.
  • 8Metalclad corp. v. United Mexican States, 40 I. L. M. 36 (2001).
  • 9Tecnicas Medioambientales tecmed S. A. v. United Mexican States, ICSID case No ARB (AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003(Spalrd Mexico BIT),paras. 121.
  • 10U. S. Department of State, Update of U. S. Bilateral Investment Treaty (Feb. 5, 2004), http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/prsrl/2004/28923.htm.

同被引文献270

引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部