期刊文献+

湿地松组培苗生根的影响因子 被引量:18

Factors Affecting Root Formation of Slash Pine Shoots by Tissue Culture
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以湿地松组培嫩梢为外植体诱导不定根。研究结果表明,基本培养基及其中附加生长素的种类及浓度对不定根的分化有较大影响,改良1/2GD是湿地松嫩梢生根的较优基本培养基,其次为1/2DCR,1/2MS;嫩梢接种在改良1/2GD+IBA2.0的培养基中培养30d后,其不定根诱导率最高达51.6%。在改良1/2GD+NAA0.05的培养基中不定根诱导率最高达59.3%,NAA与IBA组合较单独使用具有更佳的生根效果,嫩梢接种1/2GD+NAA0.05+IBA1.0上30d后最高生根率达81.3%,但NAA与6-BA或活性炭(AC)组合均不利于湿地松嫩梢的生根。生根小植株转移至无激素的改良1/2GD培养基中,不定根伸长较快。在适宜的温湿度条件下,再生植株移栽成活率达85%。 Roots induction was made with the explants of the shoots for Pinus elliottii obtained by tissue culture. Results showed that the basal medium and the categories and concentrations of additive plant growth regulators all had great effect on the differential of adventitious roots. Modified 1/2GD medium was proved superior to 1/2DCR and 1/2MS. Roots formed when excised shoots were cultivated on Modified 1/2GD medium supplemented with 2.0 mg·L^-1 IBA or 0.05 mg · L^-1 NAA for 30 days, and the highest inducing rates of roots were 51.6% and 59.3% , respectively. While the combination of NAA (0.05 mg · L^-1) and IBA (1.0 mg·L^-1) had better effect on rooting, and the rooting rate could reach 81.3% after excised shoots were cultivated on 1/2GD + NAA0.05 + IBA1.0 medium for 30 days. The medium containing NAA with 6 - BA or AC (Activated Charcoal) did not support root formation. All the plantlets were transferred to hormone -free modified 1/2GD medium for roots elongation. The survival rate was up to 85% before the regenerated plantlets were moved to the greenhouse.
机构地区 南京林业大学
出处 《东北林业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第5期15-18,共4页 Journal of Northeast Forestry University
关键词 湿地松 组织培养 不定根诱导 植株再生 Pinus elliottii Tissue culture Roots induction Plantlet regeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘用生,李友勇.植物组织培养中活性炭的使用[J].植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):214-217. 被引量:190
  • 2黄健秋,卫志明.松属树种的组织培养和原生质体培养[J].植物学通报,1994,11(1):34-42. 被引量:76
  • 3李映红,植物学报,1990年,32卷,568页
  • 4Perez-Bermudez P,Sommer H E. Factors affecting adventitious bud induction in Pinus elliottii Engelm. embryos cultured in vitro[J]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 1987(11): 25-35.
  • 5Lesney M S, Johnson J D, Korhnak T, et al. In vitro manipulation of slash pine(Pinus elliottii). Genetic manipulation of woody plants[J]. Basic Life Sciences, 1988,44: 43- 55.
  • 6Bronson M R, Dixon R K. In vitro plantlet formation from embryonic cotyledons of Pinus elliottii Engelm[A]. In:Worrall J, Dindins J L, Lester D P. Proceedings of 10th North American Forest Biology Workshop[C]. Nancouver,Canada, 1988: 261 - 267.
  • 7Burns J A,Schwarz O J,Schlarbaum S E. Multiple shoot production from seedling explants of slash pine( Pinus elliottii Engelm. )[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 1991,10: 439- 443.
  • 8Bronson M R,Dixon R K. Cultural factors influencing adventitious shoot and plantlet formation from slash pine cotyledons[J]. New Forests, 1991,5: 277- 288.
  • 9Jain S M,Dong N,Newton R J. Somatic embryogenesis in slash pine(Pinus elliottii) from immature embryos cultured in vitro[J].Plant Science Limerck, 1989,65(2) : 233- 242.
  • 10Patel K R,Kim H,Thorpe T A. Plantlet formation in pitch pine(Pinus rigida Mill) by tissue culture methods[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1986,15:147- 160.

共引文献158

同被引文献240

引证文献18

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部