摘要
工业发展和城市化的传统理论，对亚洲的某些具有较高生产力水平，且还在发展中的“大城市圈”不能充分地解释。本文对长江三角洲南部空间经济转变的“大城市圈振兴”理论进行了批判性地评论，根据最新的现场调查结果，从根本上对“转变过程”的假说提出质疑，并且提出了更适当的区域发展战略。此外还证明：关于亚洲大城市带的一般结论，必须建立在对地方性经济变革认识的基础之上。
The distinction between city and countryside in China’s spatialeconomic structure is disintegrating as industrial development in urban and rural regions are complimenting and infiltrating each other.A complex multiplicity of factors are examined to determine how they have influenced the spatial proliferation of non-agricultural activity in Kunshan at the edge of Shanghai.Analysis of the conditions and circumstances of rural industrial development peculiar to the region reveals certain contradictions.Although it may be sensible,even preferable.to locate industry based on the factors highlighted in the conventional models of industrial location.local level realities militate against this.Thus the conventional wisdom of established theories of industrial development and urbanization does not adequately explain the emergence of certain relatively productive 'mega-urban 'regions.The resulting theoretical reformulations have culminated in a framework for planning and policy formation embedded in the concept of“metrofitting”.This artical critically evaluates metrofitting in the context of the spatial economic transformation observed in the lower Chang Jiang delta.Findings from recent field investigations fundamentally challenge assumptions regarding the processes which underlye this transformation. More appropriate regional development strategies are therefore.suggested.Moreover the analysis demonstraies that general conclusions about China’s mega-urban regions must rest upon a detailed understanding of the mechanisms of local economic change.
出处
《地理学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
1996年第3期272-282,共11页
Acta Geographica Sinica
关键词
区域发展
城市化
长江三角洲
城市圈
rural urbanization
regional development
urban geography.
