期刊文献+

米氮平治疗儿童抑郁症对照研究 被引量:8

Comparative Study of Mirtazapine and Paroxetine in the Treatment of Depression in Childhood
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨米氮平治疗儿童抑郁症患者的疗效及不良反应。方法将52例符合《中国精神疾病分类方案与诊断标准》第3版(CCMD—3)抑郁症诊断标准,年龄<18岁的儿童抑郁症患者,应用米氮平及帕罗西汀各26例进行对照治疗,观察6周,采用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD),临床疗效总评量表(CGI),副反应量表(TESS)评定临床疗效及不良反应。结果两药疗效相仿,米氮平起效快,主要不良反应为嗜睡。结论米氮平治疗儿童抑郁症安全有效,不良反应少。 Objective To explore the efficacy and side effects of mirtazapine in the treatment of depression in childhood. Methods 52 cases with a diagnosis depression according to CCMD-3, whose ages were less than 18 years old, were randomly divided into mirtazapine proup(n= 26)and paroxetine group(n= 26) for 6 weeks. Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), clinical global impression (CGI) and treatment emergent sympton scale(TESS) were adopted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and side effects. Results Two drugs had similar efficacy, but mirtazapine took effects more quickly. The major side effect was somnolence. Conclusion Mitazapine in the treatment of depression in childhood, is a safe and effective antidepressant and produces fewer side effects.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2005年第5期347-348,共2页 China Journal of Health Psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Bremner, ID. A double-blind comparison of Org 3770, amitriptyline, and placebo in major depression. J Clin Psychiatry, 1995,56:519~525.
  • 2Anttila SA, Leinonen EV. A review of the pharmacological and clinical profile of mirtazapine. CNS Drug Rrug Reviews, 2001,7:249~ 264.
  • 3Benkert O, Muller M, Szegedi A. An overview of the clinial efficacy of mirtazapine. Hum Psychopharmacol, 2002,17 (suppl 1) :23~26.
  • 4Otto Benkert, Armin Szegedi. Mirtazapine compared with paroxetine in major depression(J). J Clin Psychiaty, 2000, 61: 645~663.
  • 5Puzantian, Talia. Mirtazapine, an antidepressant (formulay Review). American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1998, 55(1):44~49.

同被引文献111

引证文献8

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部