期刊文献+

基于时间驱动因素的两种作业成本法的分析比较 被引量:3

Analysis and Comparison of Two Types of Time-driven Activity-based Costing
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 推介并分析了美国最新的一种基于时间驱动因素的修正作业成本法,并通过对其与传统作业成本法的比较发现,这种修正作业成本法不仅便于操作,而且在成本动因率的计算、成本的报告与分析、模型的更新等方面对传统的作业成本法进行了改进,从而能够为企业提供更加准确及时、更具决策相关性的成本信息。同时还对修正作业法所带来的新问题进行了讨论,提出了相应的观点和解决办法。 Many companies have abandoned the conventional activity-based costing because of its complexity. Nowadays it is modified and comes into use in America, namely time-driven activity-based costing. Introduces the new approach and compares it with the conventional one. The new approach is not only easier to build and maintain but improves greatly the calculation of cost-driver rate, analysis and report of cost and updating of model. Therefore, it can provide more accurate, prompt and decision-related cost information. Discusses and gives some suggestion to the new problems which are brought into being with the new approach.
作者 陈玉清 严琳
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第5期342-345,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
关键词 时间驱动因素 修正作业成本法 成本动因率 time-driven modified activity-based costing cost-driver rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1穆林娟,潘爱香.构建作业基础标准成本系统[J].会计研究,2004(5):62-66. 被引量:36
  • 2Stevens M E.Activity-based planning and budgeting: the coming of age of the "consumption-based"approach [J].Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance,2004,15(3):15-28.
  • 3Kaplan R S,Anderson S R.Time-driven activity-based costing [J].Harvard Business Review,2004,(11):131-138.

二级参考文献7

共引文献35

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部