期刊文献+

急诊非创伤患者心肺复苏预后评分方法的研究 被引量:4

Study of a Resuscitation Predictor Scoring System (PRSS) for non-trauma patients in the emergency department
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的通过统计学方法建立心肺复苏预后评分系统,用于院内急诊非创伤病人复苏预后的客观判断.方法选取病例323例,研究组(n=240)通过Logistic回归分析及回归OR值赋分的方法产生'复苏预后评分表',检验组(n=83)对评分表进行验证.结果 Logistic回归分析预测即时复苏失败的因素有年龄、心电图、停跳原因、基础病,对出院最有影响的变量是GCS.根据回归OR值得出的分值分别是:<50岁:1分,50~70岁:3分,>70岁:6分;室颤:1分,室速、心动过速:2分,无脉电活动:6分,缓慢型心律:3分;急性心肌梗死、恶性心律失常:1分,呼吸衰竭:1分,急性心力衰竭:3分,其他:4分;基础病:3分.检验组ROC曲线下面积0.867,检验敏感性71.8%,特异性83.3%.结论根据Logistic回归分析中各变量每个分类的OR值赋分,得出的复苏预后评分表对复苏结果具有良好的预测效能. Objective To establish a Resuscitation Predictor Scoring System (PRSS) for non- trauma patients in emergency department by statistical analysis. Methods 323 patients were divided into two groups, the group 1 ( n = 240) derived a predictive models based on logistic regression, the group 2 ( n = 83) validated the models. Results Variables related to immediate survival were age, ECG, immediate causes of cardiac arrest, pre- existing disease conditions. GCS was the only predictor of discharge. The scores based on OR were: age 〈 50:1 point, 51 - 70:3 points, 〉 70:6 points; VF: 1 point, VT and tachycardia: 2 points, asystole: 6 points, bmdycardia: 3 points; AMI or arrhythmia: 1 point, respiratory insufficiency: 1 point, heart failure: 3 points, others: 4 points; underlying disease: 3 points. Area under ROC was 0.867, sensitivity was 71.8%, specificity was 83.3% ~ Conclusion The scoring system based on OR of Logistic regression can predict the result of CPR.
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第9期638-640,共3页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
关键词 急诊 心肺复苏 预后因素 评分 Emergency Cardiopulmonary resuseitation(CPR) Prognostic factors Scoring system
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Eisenberg M, Hallstrom A, Bergner L. The ACLS score: Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. JAMA,1981,246(1):50-52.
  • 2Lesley B, Kevin S . Predicting unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): a comparison of three morbidity scores[J]. Resuscitation,1999,40(2):89-95.
  • 3Stefek G, Dejan K. Does the Mainz Emergency Evaluation Scoring (MEES) in combination with capnometry (MEESc) help in the prognosis of outcome from cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a pre-hospital setting[J]? Resuscitation,2003,58(1):89-96.
  • 4Ebell MH, Kruse JA, Smith M, et al. Failure of three decision rules to predict the outcome of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. Med Decis Making,1997,17:171-177.
  • 5贺佳,高尔生,楼超华.综合评价中权重系数及标准化方法的研究[J].中国公共卫生,2001,17(11):1048-1050. 被引量:68
  • 6Randolph AG, Guyatt, Gordon H, et al. Understanding articles describing clinical prediction tools[J]. Critical Care Med,1998,26(9):1603-1612.
  • 7Simon C, Juliette Ca. Predicting survival, in-hospital cardiac arrests: Resuscitation survival variables and training effectiveness[J]. Resuscitation,1997,35:17-32.
  • 8Dodek PM, Wiggs BR. Logistic regression model to predict outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest: validation, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity[J]. Resuscitation,1998,36(3):201-220.
  • 9Grubb NR, Elton RA, Fox KA. In-hospital mortality after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. Lancet,1995,346(8972):417-421.
  • 10Suat B, Aengevaeren WRM, Luijten HJE, et al. Successful out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what is the optimal in-hospital treatment strategy[J]. Resuscitation,2000,47(2):155-161.

二级参考文献3

共引文献67

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部