期刊文献+

氯咪帕明单用及合并碳酸锂治疗双相抑郁的对照研究 被引量:2

A comparative study of chlomipramine combined with lithium and chlomipramine alone in the treatment of bipolar depression.
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨氯咪帕明合并碳酸锂治疗双相抑郁的疗效及安全性。方法将71例符合CCMD-3诊断标准的双相抑郁患者随机分为两组,分别给予氯咪帕明单用及合并碳酸锂治疗,共治疗6周。采用HAMD评定疗效,TESS评定副反应。结果单用组有效率54.5%,合用组有效率78.9%,差异有显著性。转躁率单用组36%,合用组16%,两者比较有显著性差异。结论合用组疗效肯定,转躁率低。 Objective To explore the efficacy and side effects of chlomipramine with lithium in the treatment of bipolar depression. Methods A total of 71 patients who met the criteria of CCMD-3 for bipolar depression were randomly assigned into two groups, one group treated with chlompramine combined with lithium, the other with chlomipramine alone for 6 weeks. The efficacy was assessed by Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAMD) ,and the safety was assessed by Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS). Results The improvement rate in the study group was 78.9%, and that in the control group was 54.5%, and there was significant difference between two groups. The incidences of depression shifted to mania episode in study group and control group were 16% and 36%, and singnificant difference existed. Conclusion Chlomipramine combined with lithium is effective with lower incidence of shifted to mania episode.
出处 《山东精神医学》 2005年第4期248-249,共2页 Shangdong Archives of Psychiatry
关键词 氯咪帕明 碳酸锂 双相抑郁 Chlomipramine Lithium Bipolar depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1Keck PE Jr, McElroy SL. New approaches in managing bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry, 2003, 64 Suppl 1:13-18.
  • 2Hirschfeld RM, Lewis L, Vornik LA. Perceptions and impact of bipolar disorder: how far have we really come? J Clin Psychiatry, 2003, 64:161-174.
  • 3Hirschfeld RM, Williams JB, Spitzer RL, et al. Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Am J Psychiatry, 2000, 157:1873-1875.
  • 4Miller C, Ghaemi SN, Klugman J, et al. Utility of mood disorder questionnaire and bipolar spectrum diagnostic scale. Program and abstracts of the American Psychiatric Association 155th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia: 2002.
  • 5Nemeroff CB, Evans DL, Gyulai L, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of imipramine and paroxetine in the treatment of bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry, 2001, 158:906-912.
  • 6Calabrese JR, Bowden CL, Sachs GS, et al. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine monotherapy in outpatients with bipolar I depression:lamictal 602 study group. J Clin Psychiatry, 1999, 60:79-88.
  • 7Frye MA, Ketter TA, Kimbrell TA, et al. A placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine and gabapentin monotherapy in refractory mood disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 2000, 20:607-614.
  • 8Bowden CL. Novel treatments for bipolar disorder. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2001, 10:661-671.
  • 9Tohen M, Vieta E, Calabrese J, et al. Efficacy of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2003, 60:1079-1088.
  • 10Tohen M, Marneros A, Bowden CL, et al. Olanzapine versus lithium in relapse prevention in bipolar disorder. Program and abstracts of the American Psychiatric Association 156th Annual Meeting,California:2003.

共引文献43

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部