摘要
目的观察立好和瑞宇两种喷雾皮肤消毒剂的临床应用效果。方法将受试患者90例随机分为实验组1(立好组)、实验组2(瑞宇组)和对照组(碘酒组),每组30例;立好组和瑞宇组采用喷雾皮肤消毒法,碘酒组采用常规皮肤擦拭消毒法;采样与检测方法按卫生部《医院消毒技术规范》执行。结果3组的杀灭率和消毒合格率比较,差异均无显著性(P>0.05);立好组和瑞宇组的1次消毒操作时间分别与碘酒组比较,差异均有极显著性(P<0.001)。结论立好和瑞宇两种喷雾皮肤消毒剂的消毒效果均确切,与传统的碘酒、乙醇消毒法比较效果无差异,且操作简便,有助于提高护士的工作效率。
OBJECTIVE To observe the efficacy of skin disinfectants “Lihao” and “Riyu” in clinical appliciation. METHODS To sample and examine the bacterial counts of the two study groups and the control group before and after disinection; and to record respectively the time of carrying out the disinfection of three groups every time. RESULTS There was no significant difference among the three groups in average killing rate and disinfectant qualified rate （P〉0.05）. There was significant difference between the study groups and the control group in the time of carrying out the disinfection （P〈0.01）. CONCLUSIONS The disinfection efficacy of “Lihao” and “Riyu” is good and disinfectants are qualified. And they carry out the disinfection more simple than iodine-disinfectant, and help nurses to improve their efficiency in work.
出处
《中华医院感染学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第9期1015-1016,995,共3页
Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词
立好
瑞宇
碘酒
皮肤消毒
效果观察
Lihaol Riyu
Iodine tincture
Skin disinfection
Efficacy observation
