期刊文献+

论心理科学发展的伦理约束 被引量:4

On Ethic Restriction of Psychology Development
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 心理学需要现代伦理规范的约束。心理学的伦理约束是对心理学的一种规范与保护,这种伦理约束规范了心理学的研究,促进了心理学的健康发展,提升了心理学的质量。心理学的伦理约束体现在对研究者主体的伦理约束,对研究对象的伦理思考与伦理待遇以及研究过程与程序上的伦理规范。加强心理学的伦理约束应注意做到:制定详尽的伦理道德准则、树立研究者的伦理意识、提升研究者的伦理觉悟、对青年心理学研究者的伦理规范培训以及在学术群体内成立专门的机构审查和监督心理学研究与发展中的伦理道德问题,并采取有力的措施保证伦理约束的贯彻实施。 It is necessary for psychology to be restricted by modern ethic, Ethic restriction of psychology implies not obstruction, but standardization and protection to psychology development. The ethic restriction not only promotes the well development of psychology, but also increases the quality of psychology. Psychological ethic restriction includes: the ethic restriction for researcher, ethic consideration and treatment for research subject, ethic norms in research process. Great efforts should be strengthened to impose ethic restriction on psychology, we should make detailed ethic norms, train ethic orientation of researchers, promote their ethic proposition and educate young psychology researches in ethic norms. At the same time, we should establish special national organization to supervise ethic problems, and take strong measures to ensure ethic restriction implement completely.
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第9期15-17,28,共4页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 心理学 伦理 约束 psychology ethic restriction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1孙道进.走出“科技伦理”的误区[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,30(2):11-14. 被引量:2
  • 2Richard T. De George (2003). Ethics, Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure[J]. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 1(1): 11-25.
  • 3王海明,孙英.几个伦理学难题之我见[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1994,31(6):67-73. 被引量:5
  • 4首届“北京应用伦理学论坛”对话.应用伦理学的勃兴究竟意味着什么[J].北京:哲学研究,2004,(6):72-72.
  • 5赵国祥 赵俊峰.社会心理学原理与应用[M].开封:河南大学出版社,1991.22-56.
  • 6Robert Rosenthal (1994). Science and Ethics in Conduction,Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Research[J]. Psychological Science, Vol. 5(3): 127- 133.
  • 7Susan Jacob-Timm (2000). School Psychology in the New Millennium: Legal Influences and Ethical Issues[J ]. Psychology in the School, Vol.37 (1) :45.
  • 8Simon Rogerson (1997). Focus: Advances in Information Ethics[J]. A European Review, Vol. 6(2) :73.
  • 9American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct[S]. 1 - 15.
  • 10The British Psychological Society. (2000) Code of Conduct, Ethical Principles and Guidelines[S]. 8- 11.

二级参考文献4

共引文献5

同被引文献67

  • 1卓潇,姚本先.学校心理学研究伦理问题探析[J].中小学心理健康教育,2013(4):4-6. 被引量:2
  • 2马卫华,李石勇,赵敏,蒋兴华.我国高校科研工作中的功利化倾向及对策探讨[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(1):172-174. 被引量:22
  • 3郑爱明,江宁玉,王志琳,乔学斌,孟国祥.大学生自杀危机预警及危机干预体系的构建与思考[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2007,7(2):145-148. 被引量:13
  • 4RICH J M. Professional ethics in education[M]. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publisher. 1984:104-108.
  • 5PIPES R B, HOLSTEIN J E, AGUIRRE M G. Examining the personal- professional distinction: ethics codes and the difficulty of drawing a boundary[J]. American Psychologist, 2005, 60: 325-334.
  • 6NIMMER J G, HANDELSMAN M M. Effects of subject pool policy on student attitudes toward psychology and psychological research[J]. Teaching of Psychology, 1992,19(3): 141-144.
  • 7MORSE J M, RICHARDS L. Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002:111-113.
  • 8HAAS L J, MALOUF J L, MAYERSON N H. Ethical dilemmas in psychological practice: results of a national survey[M]//Ethical Conflicts in Psychology, BERSOFF, DONALD N, WASHINGTON DC. US: American Psychological Association, 2008:101-108.
  • 9Bersoff DN.Ethical conflicts in psychology,fourth revision[M].Washington:American Psychological Association,2008.
  • 10中国心理学会.临床与咨询心理学工作伦理守则[S/OL].(2011-6-22)[2013-10-16].http:∥www.chinacpb.org/_d271706396.htm.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部