期刊文献+

改良筋膜内、筋膜外全子宫切除术两种术式比较分析 被引量:1

The comparative analysis of two kinds of abdominal uterus total excision,the improvedinner tendon and outer tendon uterus total excision
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较经腹改良筋膜内、筋膜外全子宫切除术两种术式的临床效果。方法对有全子宫切除手术指征的125例患者分为改良筋膜内全子宫切除组(n=61)、筋膜外全子宫切除术组(n=64),就两种术式的手术时间、出血量、手术并发症、术后并发症进行对比分析。结果改良筋膜内全子宫切除术手术时间短于筋膜外全子宫切除术,两种术式的差异有显著意义,手术并发症和术后并发症有明显差异。结论改良筋膜内全子宫切除术是目前较好的经腹全子宫切除术式,缩短了手术时间,减少了手术及术后的并发症,提高了患者术后的生活质量。 Objective To compare the clinic performances of two kinds of the abdominal uterus total excision:the improved inner tendon uterus total excision and outer tendon uterus total excision. Methods 125 patients who had the indication of uterus total excision had been operated on by the two methods:the improved inner tendon uterus total excision( n = 61 ) and the outer tendon total excision( n = 64). The time of operation, amount of bleeding,complications of operation and complications after the operation had been compared and analyzed. Results The operation time by the improved inner tendon uterus total excision was shorter than that by the outer tendon uterus total excision. The difference between the two methods was sigmficant. The complications of operation and comptications after were obviously different. Conclusion The improved inner tendon uterus total excision is better at present. It shortens the time of operation, reduces the complications after operation and improves the patients' life.
作者 张兰芳 王岚
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2005年第8期1051-1052,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

  • 1李梅彬(译),性科学大观,1994年,496页
  • 2段得琬,妇产科身心学,1993年,123页
  • 3琼·瑞妮丝,金赛性学报告(全译本),1993年,649页

共引文献39

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部