期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死患者溶栓前ST段偏移总和值的预示价值

The prognostic values of the summation of ST segment deviation after acute myocardial infarction
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者溶栓前ST段偏移总和值对院内心功能情况的预示价值.方法:序贯入选我院心内科1997年~2003年收治的首次发生AMI并接受溶栓治疗的患者,记录并对其临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果:符合入选标准的患者有136例,40例患者院内发生心功能不全,占29.4%.以溶栓前ST段偏移总和值将患者分为A组、B组、C组,组间比较:溶栓前ST段偏移总和值越高,患者院内心功能不全的发生率越高.Logistic多因素逐步回归分析显示:溶栓前ST段偏移总和值是该组患者院内发生心功能不全的独立危险因素,关联强度(OR值)为2.992(P=0.006).结论:溶栓前ST段偏移总和值指标有助于早期识别发生院内心功能不全的高危AMI患者,以加强治疗,改善预后. AIM: To investigate the prognostic significance of the summation of ST segment deviation for in hospital heart failure in patients who had suffered from acute myocardial infarction ( AMI ) and undergone thrombolysis therapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed for all the hospitalized patients of our department from 1997 to 2003 who had undergone the first AMI and thrombolysis therapy. RESULTS: 136 patients met the entry criteria. Heart failure occurred to 40 patients(29.4% ). The patients were divided into three groups according to the summation of ST segment deviation. The analysis of variance for the difference in the three groups manifested that the higher the value for the summation of ST segment deviation, the greater the probability of heart failure occurance during hospitalization. In the multivaritate logistic regression analysis and forward stepwise selection, the summation of ST segment deviation before thrombolysis therapy was one of the independent risk factors of heart failure during hospitalization. The odds ratio value was 2.992 ( P = 0.006 ). CONCLUSION : Evaluating the summation of ST segment deviation will contribute to the identification of high risk of heart failure occurrence among the patients who have undergone the first AMI and to better therapy and prognosis.
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2005年第4期359-361,共3页 Chinese Heart Journal
关键词 心肌梗塞 急性 溶栓治疗 ST段偏移 心功能不全 myocardial infarction, acute thrombolysis therapy ST segment deviation myocardial dysfunction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1O'Connor CM, Hathoway WR, Bates ER, et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of patients in whom congestive heart failure develops after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: development of a predictive model[J]. Am Heart J,1997,133(6) :663 -673.
  • 2高友山,钱学贤,马大波.急性心肌梗死患者入院时Killip分级与预后的关系[J].心脏杂志,2001,13(1):32-33. 被引量:17
  • 3Hasdai D, Topol EJ, Kilaru R, et al. Frequency, patient characteristics, and outcomes of mild-to-moderate heart failure complicating ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction : lessons from 4 international fibrinolytic therapy trials [ J]. Am Heart J, 2003, 145(1) : 73 -79.
  • 4高润霖.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,29(12):710-725. 被引量:5251
  • 5急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1319
  • 6Schroder R, Dissmann R, Bruggemann T, et al. Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: A simple but strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994, 24(2) : 384 -391.
  • 7Gwechenberger M, Schreiber W, Kittler H, et al. Prediction of early complications in patients with acute myocardial infarction by calculation of the ST score[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 1997, 30(5) : 563- 570.
  • 8Bimbaum Y, Herz I, Sclarovsky S, et al. Prognostic significance of precordial ST segment depression on admission electrocardiogram in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction[J]. JAm Coll Cardiol, 1996, 28(2) : 313 -318.
  • 9Hathaway WR, Peterson ED, Wagner GS, et al. Prognostic significance of the in/tiM electrocardiogram in patients with acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-I investigators. Global utilization of streptokinase and t-PA for occluded coronary arteries [ J]. JAMA, 1998,279(5) : 387 -391.
  • 10Schreiber W, Kitfler H, Pieper O, et al. Prediction of 24 h, nonfatal complications in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytic therapy by calculation of the ST segment deviation score[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2003, 19(2) : 151-157.

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Lee KL,Woodlief LH,Topol EJ,et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation,1995,91(6):1659.
  • 2[2]Rouleau JL,Talajic M,Sussex B,et al. Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s-their risk factors,stratification and survival in Canada:The Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,1996,27(5):1119.
  • 3[3]Killip T,Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients[J]. Am J Cardiol,1967,20(4):457.
  • 4[4]Neskovic A,Otasevic P,Bojic M,et al. Association of Killip class on admission and left ventricular dilatation[J]. Am Heart J,1999,137(2):361.
  • 5[5]Gruppo Italiano per Io Studio della Streptochinasi nell′infarto Micardico. Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction[J]. Lancet,1987,2(8564):871.
  • 6[6]Multicenter Postinfarction Research Group. Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med,1983,309(6):331.

共引文献6452

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部