摘要
该文通过对现有稻田养鱼起源诸观点的铺叙及分析，特别是对其中用文献和考古“双重证据法”得出的“东汉说”、“三国说”的考辨，指出混淆稻田有鱼与稻田养鱼是以往研究中的通病及症结；认为前人的“《诗经》时代说”、“战国说”、“东汉说”、“三国说”、“唐代说”等观点还难以令人信服，其结论所依据的古文献和考古材料皆非稻田养鱼的可信史料；据明代方志中确凿的稻田养鱼记载可知，稻田养鱼至迟起源于明代。
The origin of fish-breeding in rice fields had been discussed by our predecessors.After studying the existing viewpoints,especially after studying'the Eastern Han Dynasty theory'and'the Three Kingdoms theory'obtained through using'the dual-evidence method',we can find out their common shortcoming of confusing'there is fish in ricefield'with'fish is bred in rice field'. This paper deems that classical theories such as'the theory of The Book of Songs age','the Three Kingdoms theory'and'the Eastern Han Dynasty theory'are all based on'reliable classical documents and archaeological materials.According to reliable Ming Dynasty local chronicles on rice field fish-breeding,it can be known that rice field fish-breeding originated in the Ming Dynasty at the latest.
出处
《中国科技史料》
CSCD
1995年第2期62-74,共13页
China Historical Materials of Science and Technology
关键词
稻田养鱼
起源
考古
明代
鱼类
养殖
rice field fish-breeding,dual-evidence method,Foru-Season Diet System,Records of Unusual Things in Lingbiao,archaeology,Ming Dynasty
