摘要
目的研究湿热环境下晕动病的发病率、防治、退化再习服规律,以为后续实验积累经验.方法首先在常温、单纯高温、湿热环境下测试人员的晕动病发病率及发病等级,然后通过两阶段训练评估晕动病的防治训练效果,对已适应的人群进行退化再适应的研究.结果 (1)常温和单纯高温下的晕动病评分、等级相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);常温、高温、湿热环境下的晕动病评分、等级相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);(2)单纯湿热环境习服训练前后,受试者的晕动病评分、等级相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);针对性的抗眩晕训练后,晕动病评分、等级相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(3)对已习服的受试者,3个月后进行的再习服训练,与训练期相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且两曲线趋势、形态并无明显差异.结论晕动病在常温、单纯高温、湿热环境下的发病率和发病等级呈逐步加重的趋势;针对湿热环境下的晕动病,单纯的湿热环境习服训练意义不大,针对性的专项抗眩晕训练则效果明显;对已习服的群体,再习服训练的间隔期至少应小于3个月.
Objective To study the regularity of incidence,prophylactic training and readaption of motion sickness in hot-humid environment by 3 experiments.Method(1)We tested the incidence of motion sickness and the grading of severity of all the subjects in room temperature,hot and hot-humid environment.(2)We evaluated the training effect of two-stage training for motion sickness.(3)We did the adaption research on those subjects who had already adapted.Results(1)Incidence and grading of severity of motion sickness between room temperature and hot environment were different(P<0.05);Incidence and grading of severity among 3 environment were different(P<0.01).(2)Incidence and grading did not change through environment adapted training(P>0.05),while they changed through anti-dizzy training(P<0.05).(3)Readaption effect was not different for those subjects who had been adapted after 3 months(P>0.05).Conclusions(1)Incidence and grading of severity for motion sickness are greater in extreme environment.(2)Environment adapted training is useless,while anti-dizzy training is useful.(3)Plastochrone for adapted training should be within 3 months.
出处
《昆明医学院学报》
2011年第12期26-31,共6页
Journal of Kunming Medical College
基金
国家新药创新重大专项基金资助项目(2008ZXJ09009-002)
关键词
湿热环境
训练
晕动病
Hot-humid environment
Training
Motion sickness
