期刊文献+

两种术式治疗贲门癌的比较 被引量:2

Comparison of two surgical approachs for cardiac carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨手术治疗贲门癌的最佳术式选择.方法 回顾性分析两种手术方式治疗78例贲门癌患者的临床资料.结果 两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后动脉氧分压等指标比较,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01),清扫淋巴结数和术后并发症等比较,两组差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05).结论 经胸贲门癌根治术优于胸腹联合贲门癌根治术. Objective To evaluate the best choice to treatment of cardia carcinoma. Methods Seventy-eight patients after resection of gastric cardia were evaluated in a retrospective study. Results Between the two groups, there were differences in the operation time, blood loss in operation and PaO2 after surgery. There was no difference in the number of lymph node resected or postoperative complications. Conclusions The approach of the thoracoabodminal incision was better than that of the thoracic incision to radical operation of cardiac carcinoma.
作者 霍前伦
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2010年第12期7-7,10,共2页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 贲门癌 手术径路 外科治疗 Cardiac carcinoma Surgical approach Surgical therapy
  • 相关文献

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部