期刊文献+

骶管阻滞复合全麻喉罩通气对小儿血液动力学的影响 被引量:4

Hemodynamic effects of caudal block with laryngeal mask airway ventilation in children undergoing general anesthesia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨骶管阻滞复合全麻喉罩通气对小儿血液动力学的影响.方法 择期下腹部、会阴部或下肢手术小儿60例,ASA I或II级.随机分为单纯气管插管组(T组),骶管阻滞复合气管插管组(CT组),骶管阻滞复合喉罩通气组(CL组),每组20例.分别于诱导前(T0)、插管即刻(T1)、手术开始(T2)、手术开始后30 min(T3)、手术开始后60 min(T4)监测心率(HR)、血压、脉搏氧饱和度、呼气末CO2分压,记录平均动脉压(MAP),中心静脉压,丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼的用量及术后不良反应的发生情况.结果 T组、CT组在T1时点MAP、HR明显高于CL组(P<0.05);CL组、CT组丙泊酚及瑞芬太尼的用量明显少于T组;CL组术后不良反应最少.结论 骶管阻滞复合全麻喉罩通气对小儿的血液动力学影响最小,不良反应少. Objective To investigate the effects of caudal block with laryngeal mask airway(LMA) ventilation on the hemodynamics of children undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ children undergoing selective lower abdominal surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20):Group T:endotracheal intubation. Group CT:caudal block and endotracheal intubatio. Group CL:caudal block and laryngeal mask airway(LMA) ventilation. HR,BP,MAP,CVP,SpO2,PetCO2 were monitored during anesthesia.HR,MAP,CVP were recorded at proinduction (T0),intubation(T1),operation(T2),30 min after operation(T3) and 60 min after operation (T4).Recording the dosage of propofol,remifentanil and adverse reactions of postoperation. Results MAP,HR at T1 were significantly higher in group T and group CT than that in group CL.The dosage of propofol and remifentanil were significantly less in group CT and group CL than that in group T. Conclusions Caudal block with LMA ventilation have little side effects on hemodynamics of the children undergoing slective surgery with general anesthesia.
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2010年第11期25-26,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 骶管阻滞 喉罩通气 全麻 气管插管 血液动力学 Caudal block Laryngeal mask airway ventilation General anesthesia Endotracheal intubation Hemodynamics
  • 相关文献

同被引文献68

  • 1杜怀清,许幸,李萍,杨春燕,吴新民.双管喉罩在小儿斜视手术麻醉的临床应用[J].中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志,2006,14(1):17-21. 被引量:5
  • 2李元健,徐志宏,胡珍敏.喉罩通气在小儿手术中的应用体会(附80例报告)[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2006,5(2):144-145. 被引量:21
  • 3Fujii Y, Saitoh Y, Tanaka H, et al . Cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation or LMA removal in children. Can J Anaesth , 1998, 45(2): 178-181.
  • 4Fr?hlich D, Schwall B, Funk W, et al . Laryngeal mask airway and uncuffed tracheal tubes are equally effective for low flow or closed system anaesthesia in children. Br J Anaesth , 1997, 79(3): 289-292.
  • 5金宝利.喉罩全麻复合臂丛神经阻滞用于小儿上肢手术[J].中外健康文摘,2009,6(33):63-64.
  • 6刘子健 张道珍.喉罩用于婴儿麻醉的临床观察[J].广东医学,1999,20(8):611-611.
  • 7Duman A, Ogün CO, Okesli S. The effect on intraocular pressure of tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children without the use of muscle relaxants. Paediatr Anaesth , 2001, 11(4): 421-424.
  • 8Brimacombe JR, Berry A. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: a meta-analysis of published literature. J Clin Anesth , 1995, 7(4): 297-305.
  • 9Sidaras G, Hunter JM. Is it safe to artificially ventilate a paralysed patient through the laryngeal mask?The jury is still out. Br JAnaesth , 2001, 86(6): 749-753.
  • 10Luba K, Cutter TW. Supraglottic airway devices in the ambulatory setting. Anesthesiol Clin , 2010, 28(2): 295-314.

引证文献4

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部