期刊文献+

内部分配改革的职务评价技术探新 被引量:5

METHODOL OGICAL EXPLORATION OF JOB EVALUATION IN DISTRIBUTION REFORMS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立工资标准系统的关键是确定职务工资率。职务间可比价值成分变异越大,对确定职务工资率的贡献也越大。根据以上研究设想采用方差分析方法进行职务评价。评价步骤包括:职务描述;对职务要素作主成分分析;对职务样本作聚类分析和判别分析;通过方差分析为可比价值各成分建构权重系数ωi。ωi‘满足:(1)ωi≥0;(2)Σωi=1;(3)ωi,间可直接比较;(4)ωi的大小与对应的可比价值成分变异一致。最后将职务评价值线性变换为工资率。在线性方程中配一个常数。和调节系数α以适合组织的管理约束条件。配合两个企业内部分配改革的研究结果显示了方差分析法的有效性和实用性。 This approach is based on the postulation that the large variance of comparable job worth component leads to large contribution to pay differentials.The evaluation procedure was as follows:1)Job description by incumbents; 2)principal component analysis on the job description data; 3)job classification by hierarchical cluster analysis based on Ward's method 4)as the critical step,weight assessment for job comparable worth components by using variance analysis to generate evaluation points. A weight is to be greater than or equal to 0.These weights are to be compared directly with each other.The sum of weights is to be 1. And most important, the size of a weight is to match with the variance of the relative component; and 5)transformation from job evaluated points into pay rates. A constant c and an adjusting coefficient a in the transformation are estimated to fit the conditions of an organization.A total of 571 samples from 524 jobs in 2 organizations were evaluated with this approach.The results proved this approach effective and applicable.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 1995年第1期91-97,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金
关键词 职务评价 方差分析法 可比价值 工资率 Job evaluation,Variance analysis approach, Comparable worth,Compensation system, Pay rates.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1陈希孺,近代回归分析.原理方法及应用,1987年

同被引文献53

  • 1王二平,呼和少布,龚曾怀,刘学芬.职务评价的方差分析法在制定职务等级中的应用[J].心理学报,1996,28(4):388-395. 被引量:1
  • 2冯友宣,戴良铁.我国公务员系统构建双重职业路径的探索[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(1):132-133. 被引量:5
  • 3张贤友,周鸿,苏力.兖矿集团岗位评价设计与实施[J].中国人力资源开发,2007,24(2):88-90. 被引量:2
  • 4[1]McCormick E J. Job and task analysis. In: Dunnette M D ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1983. 651~696
  • 5[2]Cascio W. Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management. 5th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998. 130~152
  • 6[3]Goldstein I L, Zedeck S, Schneider B. An exploration of the job analysis - content validity process. In: Schmitt N, Borman W C, ed. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993. 3~34
  • 7[4]Morgeson F P, Campion M A. Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82: 627~655
  • 8[5]Madden J M. A comparison of three methods of rating-scales construction. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 1964, 2: 43~50
  • 9[6]Richman W L, Quinones M A. Task frequency ratings accuracy: The effect of task engagement and experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, 81: 512~524
  • 10[8]Harvey R J, Lozada-Larsen S R. Influence of amount of job descriptive information on job analysis rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73: 457~461

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部