期刊文献+

中美双边贸易:兼容性与非兼容性及其走向 被引量:5

China-U.S. Bilateral Trade: Compatibility and Incompatibility
原文传递
导出
摘要 中美贸易存在着兼容性,这是中美两国互补共赢和密不可分的经贸关系的基础。但当前中美贸易也存在着非兼容性,其突出表现为中美之间的贸易摩擦不断增加,主要集中在微观经济摩擦和宏观经济摩擦两大方面。实际上,中美两国都已经认识到发展中美经贸合作的重要意义,中美贸易的兼容性大于非兼容性、互补性大于竞争性。和平共处共赢、摩擦对立双输。解决美国对华贸易逆差的正确选择应当是,美国进一步扩大对华出口,而并非限制中国对美国的出口。要解决中国外贸发展的脆弱性问题、破解中国与美国贸易摩擦不断加剧的难题,需要对中国的外贸发展战略和现行外贸政策进行反思和重新定位。 Trade between China and the United States is compatible, this compatibility is the foundation of the trade and economic relationship between the two countries, which is complementary, mutual beneficial, and interwoven. However,incompatibility in the form of increasing trade conflicts does exist at the micro and macro levels. As a matter of fact, both countries have recognized the importance of developing a good trade and economic relationship. Compatibility is stronger than incompatibility in Sino-America trade, it is more complementary than competitive. Both sides will win if they could work together peacefully, and will lose if antagonism and conflict prevail. The U.S. has a trade deficit with China and has many options to solve the problem. The right one is to increase its exports to China, not to set up limitations to imports from China.China also needs to re-evaluate and rectify its trade strategy." in order to improve the vulnerable trade relationship and solve the increasing trade conflicts.
作者 张琦 王元龙
出处 《国际金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第8期45-52,共8页 Studies of International Finance
关键词 中美贸易 兼容性 非兼容性 战略选择 Sino-America Trade Compatibility Incompatibility Trade Strategy.
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献14

  • 1王元龙.对我国外汇储备问题的若干思考[J].中国金融,2004(23):29-30. 被引量:20
  • 2.[EB/OL].中华人民共和国商务部网站(www.mofcom.gov.cn).,.
  • 3.[EB/OL].美国商务部网站(www.commerce.gov).,.
  • 4KAGITANI, KOICHI "Resistance to Trade Liberalization in Unionized Sector", Himeji Dokkyo University.
  • 5Krugman, P. 1984. "Import protection as export protection, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade",Oxford University Press.
  • 6Scherer Ron., US-China Trade Tensions Rise, Christian Science Monitor, December 2003.
  • 7Suranovic, Steven, "International Trade Theory and Policy: Trade History and Trade Law," The International Economics Study Center.
  • 8Bhagwati, Jagdish N. "Directly Unproductive, Profit-Seeking (DUP) Activities." Journal of Political Economy 9:988-1002.
  • 9Deraniyagala, Sonali and Ben Fine, "New trade theory versus old trade policy", Cambridge Journal of Econoniics:Nov 2001; 25, 6.
  • 10Grossman, Gene M and Elhanan Helpman (1994) "Protection for Sale." American Economic Review.

共引文献134

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部