期刊文献+

中文民事判决书的情态意义分析 被引量:7

A "modality" analysis of written Chinese civil judicial verdicts
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 中文民事判决书作为具有法律效力的非规范性文件,具有特定的人际功能。本文将主要以Halliday系统功能语言学理论中的情态系统为理论框架,以中文二审民事判决书为研究对象,重点探讨在二审民事判决书各组成部分中情态意义的言语实现方式,比如贬义色彩的词语、意态能愿动词、表归一度的附加语、主观隐喻性小句。通过本研究,作者试图从语言学的角度阐释中文民事判决书所揭示的人际功能,并寻求其法律上的相关解释和依据。 This article examines proceedings of the second trial phase concerning written verdicts of Chinese civil courts in light of the modality system in Halliday's systemic functional grammar. Primary source data are analyzed for characteristics of modality including its speech forms realized in the different parts of written Chinese civil judicial verdicts and the meanings encoded in those parts. Specific grammatical resources of these characteristics can manifest themselves in depreciatory words or phrases, modal verb operator, mood adjuncts and subjective metaphor clauses. These linguistic forms, which are unique to Chinese language, can affect specific modality in Chinese written civil decisions. From a linguistic point of view the interpersonal functions can be identified in written verdicts, providing legal interpretations and evidence of these functions.
作者 李诗芳
机构地区 哈尔滨师范大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期272-278,共7页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 黑龙江省教育厅2004年人文社会科学研究项目(编号:10542041)
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1龙卫球.民法总论[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2002..
  • 2Bybee, J. & F. Susanne (eds.). 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse [C]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
  • 3Conley, J. M. & W. M. O'Barr. 1998. Just Word [M]. The University of Chicago Press.
  • 4Finegan, E. 1999. Language: Its Structure and Use (3^rd edition) [M]. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  • 5Fowler, R. 1996. Linguistic Criticism [M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • 6Givon, T. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar [M]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
  • 7Halliday, M. A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Armold.
  • 8Halliday, M. A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Armold.
  • 9Holmes, J. 1984. Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures [J]. Te Reo 27.
  • 10Hubler, A. 1983. Understatements and Hedges in English[M]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.

共引文献127

同被引文献89

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部