期刊文献+

肺癌术后硬膜外患者自控镇痛的临床观察

Comparison between Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA)after Operation on Lung Cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较硬膜外自控镇痛与静脉输注自控镇痛的效果及不良反应。方法:选择60例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期肺癌手术的患者,随机分为两组。I组30例,硬膜外自控镇痛(PCEA)。采用中美合资珠海福尼亚镇痛泵,以1.2%浓度利多卡因,最大输注量13ml/h输入硬膜外腔。Ⅱ组30例,静脉输注自控镇痛(PCIA),同样采用以上镇痛泵,以芬太尼0.3μg/(kg·h)锁定速率1ml/h(自控镇痛1ml/15min)输入静脉。镇痛质量评定优:有效咳嗽无痛;良:有效咳嗽轻度疼痛,可以忍受;中:需要额外辅助镇痛药的有效咳嗽;差:伴随呼吸持续疼痛,睡眠受干扰,必须加用镇痛药、镇静药。同时观察头晕、恶心呕吐、搔痒、呼吸抑制及其他各项生命指标。结果:PCEA组:优+良26例,占86.7%,中3例,差1例因术后1天硬膜外导管脱出未记录在内。3例恶心呕吐,占10%。其他生命指标正常。PCIA组:优+良11例,占36.6%,中19例,占63.3%。头晕、恶心呕吐等不良反应23例,占76.6%。其他生命指标正常。结论:PCEA用于肺癌术后控制疼痛效果确切,优于静脉输注自控镇痛,且不良反应轻。 Objective: To compare the curative effect and adverse reaction of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with that of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Methods: Sixty patients undergoing elective surgical treatment of lung cancer were randomly assigned to two group. In the PCEA group, 1.2% lidocaine was infused to epidural space at a rate of 5 ml/h and a bolus of 2 ml/15 rain interval time. In the PCIA group, fentanyl was infused intravenously at lock rate of 0.3μg/(kg·h) (1ml), and a bolus of 1 ml/15 rain interval. The degree of pain control was evaluated at four levels, i.e. grade 1 with effective expectoration and no pain; grade 2 with effective expectoration and light pain;grade 3 with rescue drug to relief the pain during effective expectoration and grand 4 with continuous pain as breath and sleep was interfered. Additional treatment sedation and analgesia was needed. Physical sign and unwanted side effect were also recorded. Results: In the PCEA group patients with grade 1 or 2 accounted for 86.7% (20/30), and patients with grade 3 (3) and grade 4 (prolapse of epidural tube was not recorded). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was 10% (3/30) in PCEA. In the PCIA group pain-relief patients with grade 1 or 2 accounted for 36.6% (11/30) only. The incidence of dizziness, nausea and vomitting was 76.6% (23/30) and the other sign was normal. Conclusion: The effect of PCEA is better than that of PCIA in pain control after surgical treatment of lung cancer.
作者 马长青 周鹏
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第15期883-884,888,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
关键词 肺癌 PCEA 有效咳嗽排痰 Lung cancer PCEA Effective expectoration
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘忠渊,张富春,赵干,钟哲,王宾.手术应激反应的新概念——神经免疫内分泌学说[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1995,16(4):193-195. 被引量:84
  • 2钱燕宁,林桂芳.手术应激与胰岛素敏感性下降[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1995,16(4):195-197. 被引量:36
  • 3蒋春雷,刘新垣,路长林.白细胞介素2的中枢作用[J].生理科学进展,1995,26(4):352-354. 被引量:5
  • 4[1]Hori L,Fukuda M,Suzuki H,et al.SART stress effects on lymphocytes in the thymus and spleen of normal, adrenateclomized and sympathectomized mice.Clin Immunol and Immunopathol,1993,68:243.
  • 5[2]Brown SL,Van Epps DE.Opioid peptides modulate production of interferon gamma by human mononuclear cells.Cell Immunol,1986,103:19~26.
  • 6[4]Song C,Merali Z,Anisman H. Variations of nucleus accumbens dopamine and serotonin following systemic interleukin-1, interleukin-2 or interleukin-6 treatment. Neuroscience ,1999,88:823~836.
  • 7[5]Baigrie RJ,Lamont PM,Whiting S,et al.Portal endotoxin and cytokine responses during abdominal aortic surgery.Am J Surg,1993,166:248~251.
  • 8[6]Kimiaki Ai,Yoshimi Kotake,Tomoyuki Satoh,et al.Epidural anesthesia retards intestinal acidosis and reduces portal vein endotoxin concentrations during progressive hypoxia in rabbits.Anesthesiology,2001,94:263~269.
  • 9[7]Shavit Y, Depaulis A, Martin FC, et al. Involvement of brain opiate receptors in the immunosuppressive effect of morphine. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1986, 82:7114.
  • 10[8]Nelson CJ,Dykstra LA,Lysle DT.Comparison of the time course of morphine's analgesic and immunologic effects.Anesth Analg,1997,85:620~626.

共引文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部