摘要
目的:评价单侧多功能外固定架治疗Ⅲ型胫骨骨折的临床疗效;探讨该治疗方法的操作要点。方法:对我院以单多功能外固定支架治疗Ⅲ型胫骨骨121例患者进行回顾性研究,并与23例跟骨牵引患者治疗结果相比较。结果:单侧多功能外固定支架治疗组:6例皮肤软组织坏死,2例假关节形成,4例并发慢性骨髓炎,2例截肢。余病例均愈合,功能恢复满意;跟骨牵引对照组:3例皮肤软组织坏死,1例假关节形成,3例并发慢性骨髓炎,2例截肢,余病例均愈合。结论:应用单侧多功能外固定支架治疗Ⅲ型胫骨骨折有利于骨折愈合,也有利于软组织修复。正确的操作是本治疗方法成功的关键。
Objective：To evaluate the treatment effect of the unilateral multifunctional external fixation apparatus for the treatment of type Ⅲ tibia fracture and to discuss the key of the method. Methods： 121 patients of type Ⅲ tibia fracture treated with bone traction,and the effect of them were compared. Results ：In UMEFA group：there were Skin and soft tissue necrosis 6 cases,pseudarthrosis 2 cases ,chronic osteomyelitis 4 cases,amputation 2 cases andthe other cases with satisfactory function resumed;in bone tract group： Skin and soft tissue necrosis 3 cases,pseudarthrosis 1 cases,chronic osteomyelitis 3 cases,amputation 2 cases and the other cases with satisfactory function resumed. Conclusions：The correct operative technique are of paramount importance. Fixing with UMEFA to treat type m fracture of tibias were useful not only to union of fracture but also to soft tissue restoration.
出处
《中国中医骨伤科杂志》
CAS
2005年第4期26-28,共3页
Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics
关键词
外固定支架
治疗
Ⅲ型胫骨骨折
病例
External fixation apparatus Treatment Fracture of tibia
