摘要
本文通过对《骆驼祥子》和《约伯记》这两份经典文本进行比较分析,认为:生发于中国近现代文化文学传统的《骆驼祥子》,和从西方基督教———《圣经》思想文化文学传统衍生出来的《约伯记》,它们立足于各自的历史语境,都对“个人”的境遇及其归宿进行了探索,对“个人”观念的确立与意义作出了强有力的质询和反思。然而,它们各自的“个人”话语模式在出发点、指向和言路等方面却迥然不同,体现了中西文化中“个人”观念的巨大差异。作者力图探讨这种差异的原因,并试图从中获得启示。
The paper compares Luotuo Xiangzi with Job and holds following viewpoints: on one hand, Luotuo Xiangzi is based on the Chinese tradition of modem culture and Job based on the western Christian tradition of thoughts and culture. Each of them explores the individual' s experience and final setting place and inquires the establishment of the ideal of individual and its meaning. On the other hand, there are differences between the two text in the words style of the individual, esp. in the outpoint, direction and description, showing great differences in the ideal of individual between Chinese and Western culture. The author attempts to study the cause that made the difference, suggesting the way to construct the words of Chinese ideal of individual.
出处
《北京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期110-116,共7页
Social Sciences of Beijing