期刊文献+

易化PCI治疗ST段抬高急性心肌梗死的临床研究 被引量:1

The clinical study of facilitated PCI in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:评价小剂量溶栓剂重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(50mgrt-PA)联合经皮冠状动脉介入(易化PCI)治疗ST段抬高急性心肌梗死(STEMI)的疗效和安全性。方法:215例STEMI患者,150例行直接PCI(直接PCI组),65例rt-PA50mg滴注30min后行PCI(易化PCI组),两组患者中心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)0 ̄2级和3级但残余狭窄≥70%者(直接PCI组132例,易化PCI组52例)置入支架。比较两组PCI前后梗死相关动脉(IRA)开通率、支架置入率、ST段回落率、出院前左室射血分数、住院期间出血事件和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。结果:易化PCI组首次冠状动脉造影IRA开通率和TIMI3级血流率显著高于直接PCI组(49.2%vs20.0%,P=0.00;27.7%vs14.0%,P=0.02),术后TIMI3级血流率、ST段回落率和出院前左室射血分数亦显著高于直接PCI组[96.9%vs88.0%,P=0.04;92.3%vs78.7%,P=0.01;(64.5±7.9)%vs(51.5±15.6)%,P<0.05],而两组支架置入率、住院期间出血事件和MACE无显著差异,且均未发生脑出血。结论:在STEMI治疗中,易化PCI可使缺血心肌获得尽早再灌注,为进一步血运重建赢得时间,提高了STEMI患者术后TIMI3级血流率、改善了心肌组织水平再灌注和心功能,且未明显增加住院期间出血事件和MACE,值得推广应用。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of facilitated PCI (low-dose rt-PA combined with immediate planned rescue percutaneous coronary intervention) in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Two hundred and fifteen patients with STEMI were divided into direct PCI group (n=150) and facilitated PCI group (n=65). The patients in direct PCI group were under angiography without thrombolysis, while the patients in facilitated PCI group were under an intravenous drip of 50 mg rt-PA during 30 minutes before PCI. The patients with TIMI grade 0~2 or TIMI grade 3 but residual stenosis ≥70% (132 patients in direct PCI group, 52 patients in facilitated PCI group) were implanted with stents. The rates of recanalization before and after PCI, of the usage of stents,of ST-segment resolution, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and major hemorrhage and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in hospital were compared in two groups. Results: Compared with direct PCI group, the rates of recanalization and TIMI grade 3 before angioplasty were significantly higher in facilitated PCI group(49.2% vs 20.0%, P=0.00; 27.7% vs 14.0%, P=0.02); the rate of TIMI grade 3, ST resolution after angioplasty and LVEF in facilitated PCI group were significantly higher [96.9% vs 88.0%, P=0.04; 92.3% vs 78.7%, P=0.01; (64.5±7.9)% vs (51.5±15.6)%; P<0.05]. There were not significantly different for usage of stents, major hemorrhage and MACE in two groups. There was no intracerebral bleeding in two groups. Conclusion: Facilitated PCI, which can reduce the time of reperfusion-beginning and improve the rate of TIMI grade 3 and myocardial reperfusion and left ventricular function without increasing MACE and major hemorrhage, is effective and safe for the patients with STEMI without thrombolysis contraindication.
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2005年第6期481-483,491,共4页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
基金 山东省卫生厅青年科学基金资助项目(1999CA2CJB1)
关键词 心肌梗死 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂 Myocardial infarction Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary Recombinationtissue tissue plasminogen activator
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL, et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysic therapy for acute myocardial infartion: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2003, 361:13~20.
  • 2陈玉国,徐峰,张运,孙祎,李继福,李贵双,纪求尚,李瑞建.经皮冠脉内介入与静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的对比研究[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2004,42(6):691-693. 被引量:4
  • 3Ross AM, Coyne KS, Reiner JS, et al. A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the PACT trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 34:1954~1962.
  • 4Kelly RV, Cohen MG, Ohman EM. Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: attractive concept but difficult to prove [J]. Am Heart Hosp J, 2004, 2:211~222.
  • 5Santoro GM, Valenti R, Buonamici P, et al. Relation between ST-segment changes and myocardial perfusion evaluated by myocardial contrast echocar diography in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1998, 82:932~937.
  • 6Orford JL, Berger PB. Transport and centralization of acute coronary syndrome care[J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2004,6: 292~299.

二级参考文献8

  • 1急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1319
  • 2The GUSTO investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolysic strategies for acute myocardial infarction[J]. New Engl J Med, 1993, 329:673-682.
  • 3Lamas GA, Flaker GC, MitchellG, et al. For the survival and ventricular enlargement investigators. Effect of infarct artery patency on prognosis after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 1995, 92:1101-1109.
  • 4Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitative review[J]. JAMA, 1997, 278:2093-2098.
  • 5Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL, et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials[J]. Lancet, 2003, 361:13-20.
  • 6Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, et al. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 341:1949-1956.
  • 7Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trialPRAGUE-2[J]. Eur Heart J, 2003, 24: 94-104.
  • 8Laskey WK, Williams DO, Vlachis HA, et al. Changes in the practice if percutaneous coronary intervention:a comparison of enrollment waves in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Dynamic Registry[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2001, 87:964-969.

共引文献3

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部