期刊文献+

外切酶保护PCR快速检测垃圾焚烧飞灰中二噁英类化合物 被引量:3

The Determination of Dioxin-like Chemicals in Fly Ash Samples Using Exonuclease Protection Mediated-PCR Assay
暂未订购
导出
摘要 [目的]利用外切酶保护PCR分析(exoucleaseprotectionmediated-PCRassay,EPM-PCR)方法检测焚烧炉飞灰中的二(?)英类化合物(dioxins-likechemicals,DLCs)的毒性当量(toxicequivalencyquantities,TEQs)。[方法]将两份5g飞灰样品经过抽提、浓缩及纯化等前处理步骤后,采用EPM-PCR方法检测其中的二(?)英类化合物的TEQs。与高分辨气相色谱-质谱联用技术(high-resolutionchromatographycombinedwithhigh-resolutionmassspectrometry,HRGC-HRMS)检测结果相比较,分析其差异原因。[结果]两份垃圾焚烧飞灰样品TEQs值分别为1288ng/kg和16000ng/kg,相当于根据HRGC-HRMS检测结果估算出来的TEQ值的1.61倍和2.63倍。EPM-PCR检测TEQ值偏高可能由于检测物中包含一些被化学方法排除的物质(如多氯联苯)造成。[结论]结合有效的前处理过程,EPM-PCR可快速地用于实际样品的定性与定量检测。 [Objective] Exonuclease protection mediated-PCR(EPM-PCR) assay was applied to detect the toxic equivalency quantities(TEQs) of dioxin-like chemicals( DLCs) in fry ashes from incinerators. After the extraction, concentration and purification,5 g samples were analyzed by EPM-PCR assay. [Results] The TEQs of two samples were 1 288 ngTEQ/kg and 16 000 ngTEQ/kg respectively. Compared with those of the high-resolution chromatography combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS) method, the values were 1.61 and 2.63 times higher. The reason may be the presence of interference chemicals which are not detected by HRGC/HRMS,such as PCBs. [Conclusion] With the valid pretreatment process,EPM-PCR assay is valuable to screen and quantify the DLCs in samples rapidly.
作者 孙晞 徐顺清
出处 《环境与职业医学》 CAS 北大核心 2005年第3期202-204,共3页 Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(编号:20107002 20377017)
关键词 二噁英类化合物 酶切保护PCR 毒性当量 高分辨气相色谱-质谱联用 dioxins-like chemicals exonuclease protection mediated-PCR toxic equivalency quantities high-resolution chromatography combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Schmidt JV, Brad_field CA. Ah receptor signaling.pathways[J]. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 1996, 12: 55-89.
  • 2I Safe SH. Development validation and problenrs with the toxic equivalency factor approach for risk assessment of dioxins and related compounds[J]. Anim Sci, 1998,76:134-141.
  • 3Pauwels A, Cenijin PH, Schepens PJ, et al. Comparison of chemical-activated luciferase gene expression bioassay and gas chromatography for PCB determination in human serum and follicular fluid [J]. Environ Health Perspect,2000,108: 553-557.
  • 4Sun X, Li F, Wang Y J, et al. Development of an exonuclease protection mediated PCR bioassay for sensitive detection of Ah receptor agonists[J]. Toxicol Sci, 2004,80(1): 49-53.
  • 5Behnisch P, Hosce K, Shiozaki K, et al. Comparison between chemical(HRGC/HRMS) and biochemical analysis(Micro-EROD) from thermal processing samples( emission, residues) of municipal waste [J]. Organohalogen Compd, 2000,45: 216-219.
  • 6Schoeters G, Goyvaerts MP, Ooms D, et al. The evaluation of dioxin and dioxin-like contaminants in selected food samples obtained from the Belgian market: comparison of TEQ measurements obtained through the CALUX bioassay with congener specific chemical analysis [J]. Chemosphere, 2004,54:1289-1297.

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部